Monday, March 30, 2020

Resources for Corona Schooling


Resources for Corona Schooling

General Resources
BPL ecard instructions
National Emergency Library    from the Internet Archive
ArchiveThe Internet Archive  
Audible selected audiobooks
Free Scholastic Resources - prek-9 resources
Free Educational Offerings  for younger students

Literature
Story Preservation – need to make an account

Math

Read Alouds
Words and pictures with Scott Magoon
Chris Van Dusen Storytime online
Big list of authors doing story time
Mo Willems teaching kids to draw
Miscellaneous
50 Easy activities to do at home
Ken Burns Baseball


KidLit TV -- a collection of read alouds, podcasts, art lessons, etc.
#Readaloudalert collection


Cirque de Soleil  from your couch
Social/Emotional   Resources from Ariel Dagan
Fender - Three months of free guitar lessons
Folkcloud -folk music from around the world

For Adults

Coronavirus and democracy: Southwick voters keep their distance during outdoor Town Meeting

Coronavirus and democracy: Southwick voters keep their distance during outdoor Town Meeting

Southwick Town Meeting
Townspeople gather in the Southwick Regional School parking lot in one parking space per family to vote on three articles in a special town meeting Tuesday. (Manon L. Mirabelli photo)
SOUTHWICK — Townspeople gathered in the Southwick Regional School parking lot for an outdoor special Town Meeting in an effort to keep voters from contracting the coronoavirus while attending to time-sensitive business.

Most of the crowd, with many wearing gloves and masks, did not have an issue with the town health directive of moving the meeting outdoors, but resident Cynthia Marshall balked at putting herself in danger of illness in order to exercise her right to vote.

“This meeting could have been postponed 30 days,” she said.

Selectman Joseph Deedy said it was important to move forward with the meeting because Article 3 pertained to the $800,000 aluminum sulfate treatment of Congamond Lakes that must be done when the water is a certain temperature. Early April, he said, is the time when the lake temperature is perfect for water treatment.

Resident Michelle Pratt, a member of Citizens Restoring Congamond, spoke in support of the lake treatment plan, saying, “We really need this to happen.”

“We’re going to be happy we did this when we’re on the other side of the COVID-19 curve,” she said.
Southwick Town Meeting
Southwick resident Cynthia Marshall expressed her disapproval with the town moving ahead with a special Town Meeting amid the caronavirus outbreak. (Manon L. Mirabelli photo)
Stacie Phettenplace, who lives on Congamond Lake, thought the meeting was important enough for her to attend with a broken leg while standing out in the cold.

“This needed to be done,” she said.

Townspeople voted overwhelmingly in favor of the lakes treatment spending. They also passed the other two articles.

Residents approved granting an easement for maintaining Berkshire Avenue as requested by the Board of Selectmen and the Department of Public Works, and voted in favor of appropriating $12,000 for lighting and electrical outlets at Whalley Park Pavilion.

The Town Meeting was originally scheduled for Monday at 6:30 p.m. in the school auditorium, but was postponed until Tuesday at 6 p.m. due to snowfall and moved outdoors to keep people at a safe distance from one another.

Voters checked in with the town officials, then proceeded to one parking space per family in which to stand or sit.

Town Clerk Michelle L. Hill said 138 of Southwick’s about 6,000 voters turned out.

“This was a tremendous turnout for being outdoors,” she said.

Friday, March 27, 2020

Federal trial against EPA on fluoridation postponed due to coronavirus

Federal trial against EPA on fluoridation postponed due to coronavirus 

News provided by
Fluoride Action Network
Mar 24, 2020, 09:30 ET

NEW YORK, March 24, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- A legal case challenging the safety of water fluoridation which was set for a two-week trial in April in federal district court in San Francisco has been postponed due to the coronavirus outbreak.  The case against the EPA was brought by several environmental groups led by Food & Water Watch and Fluoride Action Network (FAN) under provisions in the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA).  Plaintiffs argue the neurotoxic harm to children presents an unreasonable risk and far outweighs any possible benefit to teeth, reports Fluoride Action Network (FAN).

Paul Connett, PhD, director of FAN, says of the scientific evidence:

"As of 2020 there have been 72 fluoride-IQ studies, of which 64 found a lower IQ among children with higher fluoride exposure. Many of the earlier studies were in places with elevated natural fluoride levels. There is now very strong evidence that fluoride damages both the fetal and infant brain at the levels used in artificially fluoridated areas."

"You only have to read four studies to realize that deliberately adding fluoride to drinking water unnecessarily endangers children's brains. Three* of these four studies were funded by the National Institutes of Health.

The first* came in Sept 2017 with a groundbreaking study from Mexico City. This study found a strong association between the amount of fluoride women were exposed to during pregnancy and lowered IQ in their offspring. 

The second* came in 2019 when a study published in JAMA Pediatrics essentially replicated the Mexico City finding in Canadian communities. 

 The third came in 2019 and found a staggering 284% increase in the prevalence of ADHD among children in fluoridated communities in Canada compared to non-fluoridated ones. 

The fourth* came in 2020, when it was reported that children who were bottle-fed in fluoridated communities in Canada lost up to 9 IQ points compared to those in non-fluoridated communities.

"The level of evidence that fluoride is neurotoxic now far exceeds the evidence that was in place when lead was banned from gasoline.

"While we wait to prove our case in court, I urge everyone, including scientists, doctors, journalists and public health officials to read these four papers and not simply take the word of fluoridation promoters on the evidence.  The risk to our children's developing brains is so great it is unconscionable to delay warnings to pregnant women and parents."

SOURCE Fluoride Action Network

Related Links

http://fluoridealert.org

 

Thursday, March 26, 2020

We Are Not Going Back To Normal

We Are Not Going Back To Normal
Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.




Tech Policy

We’re not going back to normal

Social distancing is here to stay for much more than a few weeks. It will upend our way of life, in some ways forever.

Mar 17, 2020
To stop coronavirus we will need to radically change almost everything we do: how we work, exercise, socialize, shop, manage our health, educate our kids, take care of family members.
We all want things to go back to normal quickly. But what most of us have probably not yet realized—yet will soon—is that things won’t go back to normal after a few weeks, or even a few months. Some things never will.

You can read all our coverage of the coronavirus/Covid-19 outbreak for free, and also sign up for our coronavirus newsletter. But please consider subscribing to support our nonprofit journalism.

It’s now widely agreed (even by Britain, finally) that every country needs to “flatten the curve”: impose social distancing to slow the spread of the virus so that the number of people sick at once doesn’t cause the health-care system to collapse, as it is threatening to do in Italy right now. That means the pandemic needs to last, at a low level, until either enough people have had Covid-19 to leave most immune (assuming immunity lasts for years, which we don’t know) or there’s a vaccine.

How long would that take, and how draconian do social restrictions need to be? Yesterday President Donald Trump, announcing new guidelines such as a 10-person limit on gatherings, said that “with several weeks of focused action, we can turn the corner and turn it quickly.” In China, six weeks of lockdown are beginning to ease now that new cases have fallen to a trickle.

But it won’t end there. As long as someone in the world has the virus, breakouts can and will keep recurring without stringent controls to contain them. In a report yesterday (pdf), researchers at Imperial College London proposed a way of doing this: impose more extreme social distancing measures every time admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) start to spike, and relax them each time admissions fall. Here’s how that looks in a graph.

A graph of weekly ICU cases over time.
Periodic bouts of social distancing keep the pandemic in check.
Imperial College Covid-19 Response Team.

The orange line is ICU admissions. Each time they rise above a threshold—say, 100 per week—the country would close all schools and most universities and adopt social distancing. When they drop below 50, those measures would be lifted, but people with symptoms or whose family members have symptoms would still be confined at home.

What counts as “social distancing”? The researchers define it as “All households reduce contact outside household, school or workplace by 75%.” That doesn’t mean you get to go out with your friends once a week instead of four times. It means everyone does everything they can to minimize social contact, and overall, the number of contacts falls by 75%.

Under this model, the researchers conclude, social distancing and school closures would need to be in force some two-thirds of the time—roughly two months on and one month off—until a vaccine is available, which will take at least 18 months (if it works at all). They note that the results are “qualitatively similar for the US.”

Eighteen months!? Surely there must be other solutions. Why not just build more ICUs and treat more people at once, for example?

Well, in the researchers’ model, that didn’t solve the problem. Without social distancing of the whole population, they found, even the best mitigation strategy—which means isolation or quarantine of the sick, the old, and those who have been exposed, plus school closures—would still lead to a surge of critically ill people eight times bigger than the US or UK system can cope with. (That’s the lowest, blue curve in the graph below; the flat red line is the current number of ICU beds.) Even if you set factories to churn out beds and ventilators and all the other facilities and supplies, you’d still need far more nurses and doctors to take care of everyone.

A graph of critical care beds occupied over time.
In all scenarios without widespread social distancing, the number of Covid cases overwhelms the healthcare system.
Imperial College Covid-19 Response Team
How about imposing restrictions for just one batch of five months or so? No good—once measures are lifted, the pandemic breaks out all over again, only this time it’s in winter, the worst time for overstretched health-care systems.

A graph showing critical care beds occupied over time for the suppression scenario.
If full social distancing and other measures are imposed for five months, then lifted, the pandemic comes back.
Imperial College Covid-19 Response Team.

And what if we decided to be brutal: set the threshold number of ICU admissions for triggering social distancing much higher, accepting that many more patients would die? Turns out it makes little difference. Even in the least restrictive of the Imperial College scenarios, we’re shut in more than half the time.

This isn’t a temporary disruption. It’s the start of a completely different way of life.

Friday, March 20, 2020

Drive-thru testing has begun in Massachusetts, but many require appointments, prescription from doctor

Coronavirus testing locations: Drive-thru testing has begun in Massachusetts, but many require appointments, prescription from doctor

UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester setting up screening tents amid COVID-19 outbreak

As the coronavirus pandemic reaches Massachusetts, some health care providers in the state have started offering “drive thru testing” for COVID-19.

However, the name can be misleading. The testing is far from a made-to-order process available to everyone, which customers normally associate with drive-thru in the fast-food industry.

The protocols issued by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still pertain to the drive thru testing across the state. That means drive thru testing isn’t for people looking to be tested randomly - even if they’re showing some symptoms.

Patients need to follow steps prior to arriving at drive-thru testing facilities.
“We don’t want people showing up saying, ‘I just want to know if I’m negative,’” Worcester Director of Public Health Dr. Michael Hirsch said.

The protocols require patients to have symptoms of coronavirus and be in contact with a person who has coronavirus or traveling from a country where the outbreak has reached severe totals. In addition to that, some testing facilities require an appointment and a prescription from a person’s primary care doctor.

Two hospitals in Worcester now offer drive-thru testing. St. Vincent’s Hospital began the testing over the weekend, while UMass Memorial Medical Center started on Wednesday. At UMass, patients also have to have been identified by a UMass physician first.

“I wouldn’t tell any person in Worcester to just drive up and say I need a test,” Hirsch said.

Hirsh said patients must show a fever higher than 100, symptoms of COVID-19 such as a dry cough for chest discomfort and exposure to a person who tested positive or being exposed to travel requirements.

“They don’t have enough tests,” Hirsch said. “They still thus far are essentially rationing them. I'm hoping that that situation will be fixed on a federal level, but for now, we have to be very judicious in who gets the testing and who doesn’t.”

Middleton Family Medicine, a private medical practice in Middleton, offers COVID-19 testing for its patients, but has continually had to remind their patients that tests are only performed after a series of steps.

For Middleton Family Medicine, the entire process occurs outside the office.

When a patient contacts the office, a telemedicine call is set up. Through the practice’s mobile app, they can visit with a patient virtually to examine and diagnose symptoms.

If a doctor believes the symptoms are coronavirus related, a drive-thru test is scheduled, but not for COVID-19 at first.

Dr. Andrew Ting, the Director of Operations for Middleton Family Medicine, said the practice first performs on-site in-car tests for the flu, strep throat and other possible illnesses. The tests are conducted on-site and take about 15 minutes. Depending on those results, the physician will call the patient and advise them on whether a coronavirus test is needed.

“We want to be able to do it in a very controlled environment so people aren’t freaking out but also we try to do assessments, and if appropriate we will do the COVID testing,” Ting said.

A similar protocol is being followed in Cape Cod.

Falmouth Hospital and Cape Cod Hospital are each conducting drive-thru testing, but anyone arriving at the sites without a doctor’s prescription or an appointment will be “turned away without exception.”

“Cape Cod Healthcare is the safety net for the entire community. We are working tirelessly to address the spread of COVID-19, which will require us to come together as a community to break down any possible barriers to care,” President and CEO of Cape Cod Healthcare Michael Lauf said in a statement.

In Boston, Atrius Health has tested 195 people. As of Wednesday, it had the capacity to test 180 per day. By the end of the week, that number could jump to 200 per day according to Sean Barwis, the Director of Urgent Care at Atrius Health.

Still it’s not a true drive thru test. Patients must be triaged for COVID-19 testing then they can schedule an appointment for the in-car testing. 

In Middleton, Ting said in-car testing is conducted by medical staff in full personal protective equipment. Tests are administered every day from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in 15-minute intervals that are by appointment only for the private practice’s patients.

Middleton Family Medicine uses Labcorp to confirm its coronavirus testing. Results normally come back in three to five days depending on where the samples are sent.

Labcorp and Quest are the two national private testing agencies. Hirsch said Quest can take about three days for test results.

On Monday, Gov. Charlie Baker said he would like to see Massachusetts test more. The state laboratory has conducted at least 1,367 tests as of Tuesday. Working with private companies like Labcorp and Quest should bolster the testing rate across the state.

“I think this is going to get better,” Hirsch said. “We’re all unfortunately going to have more and more experience with this. The test kits are going to get faster and their availability is going to get more.”





Medical Martial Law ?

Coronavirus response: National Guard activated in Massachusetts to add manpower for growing crisis

Fluoride & Osteoarthritis



Fluoride & Osteoarthritis

By Michael Connett | August 2012 
 
Osteoarthritis, the number one cause of disability in the U.S., is a disease marked by a progressively debilitating stiffness and pain in the joints. The stiffness and pain results from degeneration in the joint cartilage, degeneration in the bone tissue underlying the joints, and bony overgrowth as well. (CDC 2011) The CDC estimates that over 27 million Americans have the condition.

It has long been observed that skeletal fluorosis (a bone disease caused by too much fluoride) can cause symptoms and degenerative changes that closely resemble osteoarthritis. While these arthritic effects were once considered to be confined to those with skeletal fluorosis, recent research shows that fluoride can cause osteoarthritis in the absence of traditionally defined fluorosis.

If conventional methods for detecting skeletal fluorosis continue to be used, many individuals with fluoride-induced osteoarthritis will not receive the correct diagnosis and treatment.

Symptoms and Bone Changes of Skeletal Fluorosis Can Closely Resemble Osteoarthritis

The symptoms of skeletal fluorosis (chronic joint pain and stiffness) mimic the symptoms of osteoarthritis. As an example of this, the following figure displays the findings from a recent Chinese study that investigated the prevalence of osteoarthritic symptoms in populations based on the level of fluoride in the drinking water:



It’s not just the symptoms of fluorosis that resemble osteoarthritis; the bone changes of fluorosis resemble osteoarthritis as well. Skeletal fluorosis causes bony outgrowths (i.e., osteophytes), degradation and calcification of cartilage, osteosclerosis, and reduced space between the joint — conditions common to osteoarthritis, including osteoarthritis of the spine (spondylosis).  As noted in a recent study:

“because some of the early clinical symptoms resemble those of osteoarthritis, the first clinical phases of skeletal fluorosis could be easily misdiagnosed.” (Petrone 2011).

Fluoride Intake Can Cause Osteoarthritis

Not only can skeletal fluorosis produce bone changes that resemble osteoarthritis; it can cause osteoarthritis itself. (Luo 2012; Su 2012; Bao 2003; Savas 2001; Tartatovskaya 1995; Chen 1988; Xu 1987).

This fact was convincingly demonstrated in a recent, well-conducted study by a Chinese research group. (Bao 2003)  In the study, the researchers x-rayed the right hands of adults living in a fluorosis area. They then compared these x-rays with the findings of a nearby non-fluorosis area and the findings of a nationwide study that they had previously conducted. The incidence of osteoarthritis in the fluorosis area was “remarkably higher” than in either the adjacent area or the nation as a whole.

According to the researchers, “the osteoarthritis caused by fluorosis differs from ordinary osteoarthritis in severity rather than in nature.”

Fluoride Can Cause Osteoarthritis BEFORE Skeletal Fluorosis Is Evident

For years, U.S. health authorities have assumed that fluoride does not cause arthritic symptoms before the traditional bone changes of fluorosis are evident on x-ray. Recent research strongly suggests that this long-held assumption is in error.

Savas (2001)
Of particular significance is a study from Turkey which found strong evidence of a fluoride-osteoarthritis link in individuals who did not have telltale sign of skeletal fluorosis. (Savas 2001) According to the study, the most common radiological finding among the fluorosis patients was knee osteoarthritis — which was found in 66% of the 56 fluorosis patients examined. By contrast, only 3.6% of the fluorosis patients had axial osteosclerosis (i.e., hyperdense bone of the lower spine and pelvis), which is regarded by U.S. authorities to be the first radiological sign of fluorosis. Thus, many of the fluorosis patients had knee osteoarthritis without simultaneously showing the spinal bone changes that US authorities still deem necessary to warrant a diagnosis of skeletal fluorosis.

Tartatovskaya (1995)
Consistent with this Turkish study, a team of Russian researchers have found that fluoride-exposed individuals suffer a significantly elevated rate of osteoarthritis in the absence of radiologically detectable fluorosis in the spine. (Tartatovskaya 1995).  The researchers, who were interested in determining whether fluoride exposure can exacerbate the wear and tear on joints from physical stress, examined two groups of mine workers with job activities that exposed them to significant vibration stress  (e.g., drilling). Workers who were exposed to fluoride dusts were found to have a significantly higher rate of elbow osteoarthritis (48.7% vs. 12.9%) and spondylosis (83.3% vs. 41.1%) than the mine workers not exposed to fluoride dusts.

To test the veracity of these findings, the Russian researchers conducted animal studies where they subjected mice to the isolated and combined effects of vibration and fluoride exposure. As with the mine workers, the mice  exposed to both vibration stress and fluoride experienced a greater frequency and earlier onset of degenerative joint changes than the mice exposed to either factor alone. The Russian researchers thus concluded that fluoride exposure can exacerbate the degenerative effect of physical stress on joints with or without the presence of radiologically detectable skeletal fluorosis.

Czerwinski (1988)
Consistent with the Turkish and Russian studies, a team of Polish researchers examined 2,258 fluoride-exposed workers in the aluminum industry and found high rates of arthritic effects in the absence of fluorosis bone changes. (Czerwinski 1988). Although the researchers could only detect fluorosis by x-ray in 1% of the workers, they found high rates of joint pain in the knee, hip, elbow, shoulder and lumbar spine, with the pains correlating to the duration of fluoride exposure. According to the researchers, “the only characteristic feature” of fluorosis is “multiple-joint involvement,” which “would differentiate fluorosis from monoarticular osteoarthritis, but unfortunately not from multiple-joint osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.”

Cao (2003)
Even among patients with crippling forms of fluorosis, degenerative joint damage can be the primary radiological finding, not osteosclerosis. In one study, for example, Chinese researchers found that 5 of 19 patients with crippling skeletal fluorosis “presented with mainly articular injury but relatively mild bone pathology.” (Cao 2003). The researchers termed this condition “fluorosis arthropathy.”

The Misdiagnosis Problem

Friday, March 13, 2020

Prestigious VACCINE Journal: Flu Vaccine Increases Coronavirus Infection Risk 36%

Prestigious VACCINE Journal: Flu Vaccine Increases Coronavirus Infection Risk 36%

Views 3224
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2020


A new study published in the prestigious journal Vaccine, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published by Elsevier, titled Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season, reveals that influenza vaccination may increase the risk of infection from other respiratory viruses -- a phenomenon known as virus interference. 

The purpose of the study was to evaluate so-called “test negative study designs,” which are used to calculate influenza vaccine effectiveness without consideration for the effects the flu vaccine may have in changing the risk of infection for other viruses which can cause respiratory illness, which the authors point out may result in, “potentially biasing vaccine effectiveness results in the positive direction.” They elaborate further: 
“The virus interference phenomenon goes against the basic assumption of the test-negative vaccine effectiveness study that vaccination does not change the risk of infection with other respiratory illness, thus potentially biasing vaccine effectiveness results in the positive direction. This study aimed to investigate virus interference by comparing respiratory virus status among Department of Defense personnel based on their influenza vaccination status. Furthermore, individual respiratory viruses and their association with influenza vaccination were examined.”
The study results fly directly in the face of recent health recommendations that one should get an influenza vaccine to protect against Coronavirus-19.


According to the study, “vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus.” More specifically, 
“Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of both coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively) (Table 5).” 

That represents a 36% and 51% increased risk of coronavirus and human metapneumovirus in influenza vaccinated individuals, respectively. 

While the study did find there was significant protection with flu vaccination against most influenza viruses, including also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections, previous research raises red flags. A 2018 study published in PNAS found that  receiving a flu vaccination in the current and previous season may increase aerosol shedding of flu particles 6.3 times more as compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.




GOV. BAKER ISSUES EXECUTIVE ORDER SUSPENDING PARTS OF OPEN MEETING LAW

GOV. BAKER ISSUES EXECUTIVE ORDER SUSPENDING PARTS OF OPEN MEETING LAW

  
Temporary relief is intended to enable local decision-making during COVID-19 emergency
  
March 13, 2020
  
Dear Julie Farrell,
  
Last night, Gov. Baker issued an Executive Order suspending certain provisions of the Open Meeting Law (OML). The Order is responsive to many of the concerns that municipal officials have raised over the past several days as communities respond to the COVID-19 emergency. Following the advice of public health professionals to reduce the spread of the virus, cities and towns are considering restricting access to many public buildings, seeking to hold meetings and hearings remotely, placing caps on the size of public meetings and events, and taking other actions to protect the public and those most vulnerable to the novel coronavirus. However, the current OML statutes and regulations make it virtually impossible to take all of these steps and conduct necessary governmental business at the same time. The Governor’s Executive Order provides municipalities and state agencies with an important measure of relief from the OML during the public health emergency.
  
You may wish to consult with your legal counsel to see how this action could provide you with relief or flexibility as you move forward with local actions under state law and local charter provisions to protect the public and your workforce during this unprecedented emergency. The MMA has been in close contact with the Governor's office regarding Open Meeting Law issues (and many others), and we appreciate that the Administration is moving forward
  
If you have comments or opinions regarding the efficacy/helpfulness of the executive order, please share this with our legislative team - Legislative Director John Robertson atjrobertson@mma.org and Senior Legislative Analyst Brittney Franklin atbfranklin@mma.org.
  
  

Monday, March 9, 2020

Meetings the Week of March 9, 2020

Meetings the Week of March 9, 2020
 

Monday    3/9/20

Open Space                    PCS Town Hall*                   7:00 pm
 
Tuesday  3/10/20
COA                                Sr. Drive                          1:30 pm       
Assessors                         PCS Town Hall*                4:00 pm
Planning                           PCS Town Hall*                6:30 pm
MT Policy                            Fitchburg                             6:00 pm

 
Wednesday 3/11/20
 Housing                              Bridge St                              2:00 pm

It's baaack! 
A tree growing out of the chimney of the Tucker Building! 
It's a different type of tree than the last one!


 
BOS                                    PCS Town Hall*                    6:30 pm


 
 
 

 


Thursday 3/12/20
Cemetery                           DPW                                      6:00 pm
CPC                                   Boynton PL                           6:30 pm 
 
 
Saturday 3/14/20 
Budget Workshop         PCS Town Hall*                       9:00 am      

 
   


* Pauly Cosentino Sr. Town Hall