Paul working for you.

Friday, February 7, 2020

Moms2B Avoid Fluoride

Moms2B Avoid Fluoride

During pregnancy Moms know to protect their babies by avoiding smoking, alcohol, medications, raw meat, and seafood (particularly high-mercury fish).

We need to add to this list:  fluoride in water, food, and drinks.

Why add fluoride to the list?



While there are 64 IQ studies reporting an association of fluoride exposure with lowered IQ, there are now 7 of these studies, known as the Mother-Offspring fluoride studies, that report a correlation between the level of fluoride in a pregnant women’s urine and lower IQ in their offspring.

The following four studies were funded by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Science.

(1) The largest study by Green et al. (2019) with 512 mother-child pairs, was performed in Canada. Women living in areas with fluoridated tap water compared with nonfluoridated water had significantly higher mean urinary fluoride concentrations. A 1-mg/L increase in urinary fluoride levels was associated with a 4.49-point lower IQ score in boys, but there was no statistically significant association with IQ scores in girls.

(2) In another Canadian study of 398 mother-child pairs by Till et al. (2019) titled Fluoride exposure from infant formula and child IQ in a Canadian birth cohort, the authors concluded:

“After adjusting for fetal exposure, we found that fluoride exposure during infancy predicts diminished non-verbal intelligence in children. In the absence of any benefit from fluoride consumption in the first six months, it is prudent to limit fluoride exposure by using non-fluoridated water or water with lower fluoride content as a formula diluent.”
 
(3) In 2017, a 12-year-long study by Bashash et al. was published. It reported significant reductions in children’s IQ when their mothers were exposed to fluoride during pregnancy. In this study of Mexican mother-offspring pairs conducted by American and Canadian researchers, mothers were receiving the same fluoride doses as mothers in the U.S. who live in communities that add fluoride to their water.

(4) While not an IQ study, a 2018 study by Till et al., published a national survey of urinary fluoride levels in pregnant women across Canada. Canada and the U.S. have the same “optimum” fluoride regulation of adding .7 ppm fluoride to drinking water in fluoridation schemes. The authors noted:

“We measured fluoride levels in urine samples collected during
each trimester from 1,566 pregnant women living in fluoridated
and nonfluoridated communities in a Canadian pregnancy cohort.
We found that mean urinary fluoride values were almost two
times higher for pregnant women living in fluoridated regions
than for those in nonfluoridated regions (Table 2). The differences
in MUF [maternal urinary fluoride] concentration remained significant after adjustment for relevant covariates. Urinary fluoride levels were significantly lower among women living in nonfluoridated regions, despite the so-called diffusion or halo effect”

What should pregnant women know about these studies?

Fluoride exposure was determined by measuring fluoride in the urine of the pregnant women because that is a reliable measure of total fluoride exposure. The researchers found a correlation between the urine fluoride of the pregnant mothers and a loss of IQ points in their offspring in the following 5 studies:
  • 1. Green et al. (2019) reported lower IQ at between 3 and 4 years of age.
  • 2. Bashash et al. (2017) reported lower IQ at 4 years of age and between 6 to 12 years of age.
  • 3. Thomas et al. (2018) reported lower IQ in children between 1 to 3 years of age.
  • 4. Valdez JimĂ©nez et al. (2017) reported lower IQ between the ages of 3 to 15 months.
  • 5. Li et al. (2004) reported significant differences in the behavioral neurological assessment score in 1 to 3 day-old offspring

Is this new information?

Yes. While there are  64 published studies reporting an association of fluoride exposure with a lowering of IQ in children, and over 200 animal-fluoride studies reporting damage to the brain and reduced learning and memory ability, the surprise came with the release of these mother-offspring fluoride studies. Why? Because they have clearly demonstrated, for the first time, that pregnancy is the most critical period for exposure to fluoride. The fetus now ranks as the most vulnerable of our species to fluoride’s toxicity.

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Massachusetts Fluoride Update

Massachusetts Fluoride Update


An Act Establishing a Fluoride Task Force (S2196) was introduced by Senator Bruce Tar in the 
Massachusetts State Senate last winter, and if passed, would be the first step in making the massive 
statewide economic impact of fluoridation painfully obvious to both the public and legislators.  

The bill would require that a state-level task force study how much municipalities are currently 
spending on artificial fluoridation, including the cost of the chemical, the injection equipment, the 
corrosion caused by the acidic additive, the required certifications for water employees, and much 
more.  It would finally give rate-payers and elected officials a comprehensive look at how much 
money is being wasted on this toxin rather than actual safe and effective oral health alternatives. 
A public hearing was held on the bill in 2019, and it was well supported by legal, scientific, and 
public health experts from across the state, but politicians at the State House of failed to take any 
action.  They must act on this bill by this Wednesday, February 5th, or it will die.   

Our organizer on the ground in Massachusetts has asked that you please call the co-chairs of the 
Joint Committee on Public Health to call on them to “support S2196 in favor of establishing the 
fluoride task force.” 
Sen Joanne “Jo” Comerford (D Hampshire, Franklin and Worcester) - Chair
(617) 722-1532
Jo.Comerford@masenate.gov 
Rep John Mahoney (D Worcester) - Chair
(617) 722-2130
John.Mahoney@mahouse.gov 
Follow up with all of them by email to drive home the point, cc’ing the sponsor, 
Sen Tarr: Bruce.Tarr@masenate.gov   

Then please phone your representatives in the State Legislature and tell them to approve S2196 
before the deadline on Wednesday. 
Thank you,
Stuart Cooper
Campaign Director
Fluoride Action Network

Monday, February 3, 2020

Meetings the Week of February 3, 2020

Meetings the Week of February 3, 2020
 

Monday    2/3/20

Sewer                     Reservoir St                              4:30 pm
 
 
Tuesday   2/4/20

COA                      Sr. Drive                                   1:30 pm
 
KIVA
6:30 pm
 
 
Wednesday 2/5/20

BOS                         PCS Town Hall*                     6:30 pm
 
 




 
 
Thursday 2/6/20
Adv. Com                 PCS Town Hall*                   6:30 pm
 
 
   


* Pauly Cosentino Sr. Town Hall