| 
   | 
 
| 
   
NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS
  VOLUME 25, NUMBER 27 
 | 
 
| 
   | 
 
| 
   | 
 ||
| 
   | 
 ||
| 
   
Last summer, we
  reported on the welcome news that a federal court had blocked
  California’s plan to require owners of “large capacity” magazines to
  surrender or otherwise rid themselves of their formerly-lawful property. As
  the judge in that case had put it: “On July 1, 2017, any previously
  law-abiding person in California who still possesses a firearm magazine
  capable of holding more than 10 rounds will begin their new life of crime.”
  That was a bridge too far, he decided, and blocked enforcement of the law’s
  dispossession requirement. California appealed that ruling, and now over a
  year later a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
  Circuit upheld the lower court’s ruling. The case, Duncan v. Becerra, is
  supported by both the NRA and the California Rifle & Pistol Association. 
 | 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment