Paul working for you.

Friday, November 2, 2012

Shedding Some Light…



Lo and behold! I was driving by the Town Clerk’s office and noticed an agenda posted under Light and Water. I pulled over to see what I could see. There is an agenda posted for the (I kid you not) Massachusetts Municipal Light Department Wind Energy Cooperative Corporation (MMLDWECC) Board of Directors Meeting. The meeting of the MMLDWECC is scheduled at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 6, 2012 at the offices of the Princeton Municipal Light department, 168 Worcester Rd, Princeton, MA 01541. A meeting on Election Day? Isn’t that a big no-no.

At this point, I became very curious why a meeting for a Princeton Municipal Light Department (PMLD) would appear at the Templeton Town Clerk’s office.
I thought I would go home and look up this meeting on the Town of Templeton website. Not there. Hmmm. How odd! A public meeting of a public body in the Town of Templeton is not posted on the town website. Must be some kind of mistake…it’s for Princeton right?

I googled up “Massachusetts Municipal Light Department Wind Energy Cooperative Corporation”. I discovered a few documents. One of those documents is the Princeton Municipal Light Department and Subsidiary Financial Statements December 31, 2011 and December 2010. This is the audit of the PMLD and subsidiary. I still can’t figure out the Templeton connection. I guess I’ll have to read this thing.

Found it! On page 23 Note 19 :
In October 2009, the Templeton Municipal Light & Water Plant (Templeton) joined the Cooperative in order to finance, purchase or otherwise acquire, construct, install, operate and maintain, or cause to be operated and maintained a wind turbine and ancillary equipment for the production of wind energy to be installed in Baldwinville, Massachusetts (Templeton Facilities).






If you continue reading this document, you will find information about the finances of the wind turbine projects in Templeton and Princeton. I will include this information at the end of this blog.

It appears this audit- Princeton Municipal Light Department and Subsidiary Financial Statements December 31, 2011 and December 2010. is part of the audit I had requested when I was a Light & Water commissioner. We voted to have an audit of the wind turbine project. I believe we paid a significant sum of money to have this audit completed. The auditor sent us a letter over a year ago, indicating the audit for MMLDEWCC needed to be completed first before the audit could be completed for the Templeton turbine project.

I hope once this meeting on Election Day (November 6, 2012) in Princeton is held, more information will be forthcoming on the financial status of the turbine in Templeton.


My opinion…supported by FACTS ! ! !

Julie Farrell


Not quite the entire text of Note 19 is pasted below:












NOTE 19 – MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT WIND ENERGY
                   COOPERATIVE CORPORATION (COOPERATIVE):

The significant accounting principles and policies utilized by the Massachusetts Municipal Light
Department Wind Energy Cooperative Corporation (Cooperative) are as follows:

Reporting Entity
The Cooperative is organized under Chapter 164: Section 47C of the State of Massachusetts Statutes and constitutes a municipal lighting plant cooperative.  The Cooperative was formed by Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company (MMWEC) and the Princeton Municipal Light Department (PMLD) for the purpose of financing, owning, constructing and operating wind generation facilities located in the town of Princeton, Massachusetts (Princeton Facilities).  In October 2009, the Templeton Municipal Light & Water Plant (Templeton) joined the Cooperative in order to finance, purchase or otherwise acquire, construct, install, operate and maintain, or cause to be operated and maintained a wind turbine and ancillary equipment for the production of wind energy to be installed in Baldwinville, Massachusetts (Templeton Facilities).

The powers of the Cooperative are exercised by the Board of Directors who has the right to conduct business and carry on operations.  The Board of Directors is comprised of one director who represents MMWEC and two or more Directors who represent PMLD and Templeton.

Nature of Operations
The Cooperative has constructed and is operating two 1.5-megawatt wind turbines at the PMLD wind farm in Princeton, Massachusetts and one 1.65-megawatt wind turbine at the Templeton wind farm in Baldwinville, Massachusetts.  The Cooperative provides wind energy to the customers of Princeton and Templeton and is a self-sustaining operation, providing both operational and financial value to PMLD and Templeton.

Regulation and Basis of Accounting
The financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting.  Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when the liability is incurred. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place.  Additionally, the Cooperative follows Codification ASC 980, Accounting for the Effects of

Certain Types of Regulation as it relates to the deferral of revenues and expenses to future periods in which the revenues are expected to be earned or expenses are expected to be recovered through future billings.

The Cooperative complies with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).  The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard-setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles.  Proprietary funds and similar component units apply Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) and Accounting Principles Board (APB) opinions issued on or before November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements, in which case GASB prevails.


NOTE 19 – MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT WIND ENERGY
                   COOPERATIVE CORPORATION (COOPERATIVE) (Continued):

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Cooperative’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses and debt instruments.  The estimated fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values at December 31, 2011 and 2010.  The estimated fair values have been determined through information obtained from market sources and management estimates.

Depreciation
Property and equipment is stated at cost.  Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred.  Major additions and renewals are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using straight line method.  Depreciation expense for 2011 and 2010 was $242,059 and $259,664, respectively.

Taxes
The Cooperative is exempt from federal income taxes.

Advances from Princeton Municipal Light Department
PMLD has advanced amounts to the Cooperative in order to pay for development costs associated with the Princeton Facilities that are in excess of the bond proceeds.  The advances are classified as long term as repayment is not anticipated within the current year.  There are no specific repayment terms.  The total advances to the Cooperative as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $691,211, respectively.

Use of Estimates 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Prepaid Insurance
Prepaid insurance represents insurance premiums paid in the current fiscal year benefiting future periods.

Amounts Recoverable /Payable in the Future
The difference between revenues received and expenses paid are charged to the amounts
recoverable/payable in the future account.  Such amounts will be recovered or settled through future billings.

Revenues and Expenses
The Cooperative distinguishes operating revenues and expenses from non-operating items.  Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with the utility’s principal ongoing operations.  The principal operating revenues of the Cooperative will be the contract charges to the PMLD and Templeton and the sale of renewable energy credits.  Operating expenses for the Cooperative are the costs for running the facilities.  Other revenues and expenses are classified as non-operating in the financial statements.

NOTE 19 – MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT WIND ENERGY
                   COOPERATIVE CORPORATION (COOPERATIVE) (Continued):

Revenues and Expenses (continued)
With the generation of wind power, there are renewable energy credits (RECs) that are sold on the open market. PMLD purchases the power and all attributes of the power and consequently, the RECs are settled through PMLD, as opposed to the Cooperative.  The total amount of REC sales attributed to generation for the Princeton facility during the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $100,257 and $86,283, respectively.  These amounts are not reflected in the Cooperative financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Cooperative considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Proceeds from Grant
During 2008, the Cooperative was awarded a $470,000 grant under the Renewable Energy Systems and Energy Efficiency Improvements Grant Program of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, United States Department of Agriculture (Grantor).  The purpose of the grant was to help fund the purchase and installation of two 1.5 megawatt wind turbine generators at the Princeton site.

Expenses not included in the approved budget cannot be funded with the grant unless approval is received in writing from the Grantor.  The Cooperative must follow several laws to maintain civil rights compliance.  The Cooperative used the funds received for the purchase and installation of wind turbines and other activities as specified in the grant agreement.

Cash:
 Custodial Credit Risk
The Cooperative’s funds on deposit with financial institutions are fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Deposit Insurance Fund of Massachusetts (DIF). 

Related Parties:

On behalf of the Cooperative, MMWEC records and accounts for bills received and paid.  MMWEC is also accounting for monthly contract charges rendered and payments received from PMLD.

The Cooperative entered into an agency contract with MMWEC on October 30, 2007, under which MMWEC is to serve as the Cooperative’s agent in all matters with respect to financing the construction, purchase, ownership, lease or other acquisition by the Cooperative of the Princeton Facilities or energy generated from other facilities and other property or interest therein.
Under both the agency and service contract, MMWEC is to serve as the Cooperative’s representative in the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) and in matters relating to ISO New England, Inc. (ISO-NE) in connection with the Princeton Facilities, the purchase and sale of energy therefrom or from other facilities and other property or interests therein.



NOTE 19 – MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT WIND ENERGY
                   COOPERATIVE CORPORATION (COOPERATIVE) (Continued):

Related Parties (continued):

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Cooperative incurred charges for services provided by or paid by MMWEC on behalf of the Cooperative.  As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Cooperative had an outstanding balance due to MMWEC of $1,097,759 and $621,209, respectively.

Occasionally, PMLD will incur costs related to the Princeton Facilities and then invoice the Cooperative for these costs.  During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Cooperative incurred charges of $97,413 and $441,211 which were paid by PMLD, respectively, for costs related to the Princeton Facilities.  The current year costs incurred are not considered an advance as they were recorded through the billing process. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Cooperative has an outstanding balance due to PMLD of $691,211. 

As disclosed in Commitment and Contingencies, the Cooperative entered into a lease agreement with the PMLD and is required to make annual rental payments under this agreement.
 
Debt:

In January 2009, the Cooperative converted a Line of Credit and Letter of Credit to a commercial term loan (Term Loan) which the bank granted the Cooperative in the amount of up to $7,300,000 to be used as permanent financing to support the preparation and site work on the property located in Princeton, Massachusetts, for two 273-foot wind towers and turbines, to pay the remaining costs of the project and to pay off the existing Line of Credit with the bank.  The Term Loan has a fixed interest rate of 5.5% per annum.  Principal is payable over 15 years in annual payments of $486,667 commencing on April 15, 2010, and then on April 15 of each year thereafter.  Interest is payable in semi-annual installments commencing on April 15, 2009 and October 15, 2009, and on April 15 and October 15 of each year thereafter.  All principal and accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable on demand on April 15, 2024.  The Term Loan is subject to a prepayment penalty of 1.0% of the principal prepaid if paid during the first five years of the term. The Term Loan is collateralized by the equipment and the purchase power agreement (PPA) with the Princeton Municipal Light Department.  As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Cooperative had $6,326,666 and $6,813,332, respectively, outstanding on the Term Loan.

The Cooperative incurred $35,947 of financing costs in connection with the issuance of the Term Loan, which were capitalized and will be amortized over the life of the debt instrument.  Amortization expense related to these financing costs was $2,696 and $2,508 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The remaining deferred costs balance related to the Term Loan of $25,865 is included in deferred financing costs.

Note 19 continues on page 27 with charts which do not convert well.

14 comments:

  1. Here's a Fox 25 interview with Princeton Municipal Light Department General Manager Brian Allen about how their turbine is doing in their town. Not good. And they want to sell it because the purchase has made their rates one of the highest in the state. At least that manager was freely communicating the situation to the public. The story also mentions the turbines at the prison in Gardner.

    http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/19740899/2012/10/04/mass-wind-projects-hitting-turbulence-setbacks-for-green-energy#ixzz2B4Lp4Lxf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh great, our Municipal Light and Water is now doing business with Princeston! Does that mean "the bigger they are, the harder they fall"? It just makes the mess a lot more confusing! Good job Julie! You are more than likely the only one that stops to look at that board! I 'll bet they did not think anyone would really see it. Well so much for open communication, ha, ha, ha! Hey Chris, remember that discussion Monday night? Yes, the one about putting meetings on the town web site. How is that working out, for the tax payers?? Maybe Sarah Palen could see Russia from her back yard, but none of us in Templeton can see the Meeting notices, on the board, with out driving 9 miles. Looks like we will have to make it a by-law, after all! Bev

      Delete
  2. Sounds like maybe a couple of carloads of shareholders should go to that meeting and ask some tough questions!
    I have talked about templetons liabilities and this is what I for one am afraid that they have got us into!
    7.3 million and its based on a 25 year life thats bull hit
    - the s you get the point we need to get the info for the town meeting 15 and spell it out when we talk about our petition to investigate other wrong doings. the rec money goes to the employees and not the shareholders/customers,
    wow unitil /mass electric ngrid/ are looking better and better and doing a great job
    shareholder

    ReplyDelete
  3. While the grass is not always greener on the other side of the mountain, I can tell you that with both a light bill in Templeton, 77 Partridgeville Road and one in Rindge, NH, it use to be Templeton light rates were cheap but no longer, so it may be the time to look into selling off the light department, the employees who work there now could transfer to or be hired, as part of a sale aggreement to say National Grid, people would still have jobs, they would not be on the backs of Templeton taxpayers and we could use the profits from the sale tfis infrastructure such as roads and water lines. Again, thise deserves a look but a very careful one with a very detailed financial anylisis, Mr. Will Spring ( a homework assignment for my friend Will) Just a thought from over here to Templeton taxpayers. Right now before an important town meeting, I can't help but thank (in a strange way) Bob Columbus, Viginia Wilder and Pat Mullins and all the others who took part at all those gatherings at echo hill and at the breakfast club, aka turtle, for doing all the scewed up crap, like firing Jeff Ritter and bringing carol skelton back that resulted in taxpayers coming to selectmen en mass and demanding answers and finally questioning alot of things that rsulted in the changes that have happened and are on the way to happening (hopefully) If those people had been smart and gone about things differently, they could have quite possible boondoggled the town of Templeton again and gotten away with the mess for years to come. Templeton should have an annual town block party and have a kind of history information or rememberance of these things, the beginning of Paulys blog, the recall election and the return of Julie Farrell and Jeff Ritter, the third (and final) farewell to Kopelman law firm and other events that sparked the rise of the Templeton taxpayers. The blog heard around the state, the triump of the senior center moving forward, the trojan horse of 252 baldwinville road being exposed. Okay perhaps I am getting carried away but I still like the idea of an annual block party to have a weekend of goodtimes for the town, even if we are still climbing out of a hole for a few years, we all need some sunshine to recharge the batteries to continue the fight for economic fairness and common sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With life being so busy, People tend to forget, or think things are ok. Your reminders are a good thing. Thank God, we are in a country where you can protest, and not get killed for it! Unlike where you are, wouldn't the women in Afganistan, love to speak out or go to school. There are still thing that are not right here. We have one news paper that gives slanted, or very little news, and one that does not cover much of anything at all. Again thanks to Pauly, the word gets out. Bev

      Delete
  4. I love the idea of an annual block party. I'll go in the dunk tank again!

    I believe we have uncovered the tip of the financial iceberg and that iceberg is melting. The $700,000 boondoggle will have a negative financial impact on the town for years. I have worked hard to try to get information out to people to review. I think the more people reviewing and looking at these issues will result in better solutions to the problems facing the town.

    I believe an investigation by the AG's office into the issues listed on the citizens petition is necessary so we can formulate better solutions to the problems the town needs to deal with. These issues/problems won't improve or be resolved if we pretend they don't exist.

    I think the investigation into Chapter 93 Acts of 2000 is necessary. If we are looking to create a DPW or a highway/sewer/ water department, what is the proper procedure for that to happen? Should we ask town counsel to write up a citizens petition, have town employees gather signatures on town time using town resources? Or should we try to engage in a public discussion as a BOS and water commissioners on how to proceed? That's why I would like a written response to the BOS letters to the Light and water commissioners/Manager. That way we can discuss our options as a town. What do you an to do? Maintain the status quo or look at alternatives to the water department being run as an "enterprise" by the light department?

    On the agenda for the MMLDWECC on ELECTION DAY item 5 PMLD ...there is an entry "Turbine sale". I think Anonymous 8:26 pm is right. Time for the shareholders to take a roadtrip. I'll bring the popcorn. Who wants to bring the peanuts for the peanut gallery?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. maybe it needs to be looked at, but i remember a few years ago a group of people (you)saying things that are important should be done at ATM not snuck in at a special meeting interesting when its something you want

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 9:59
      Correct. Nothing is being"snuck in" at the STM. Any change as important as reconfiguring the water to a DPW should be decided at an ATM. The discussion needs to take place BEFORE the ATM. The AG investigation is one way to gather impartial information on Chapter 93 Acts of 2000 and the Boondoggle and the Casella settlement and the WWTP settlement.

      Who knows? Maybe after the AG looks at the way 252 Baldwinville RD was handled, it could become state law that whenever you purchase a municipal building, you do NOT do a building inspection. You do NOT have an appraisal completed. This could be groundbreaking! Imagine Templeton being on the cutting edge for a change.

      Delete
    3. Anon 9:59...the difference is this article isn't asking to spend any tax payer money. There's nothing to sneak by. Its a simple request for the state to review several issues in town that have unanswered questions in order for the town to learn how to never get this financially strapped again.

      Delete
  5. Exactly who received that $700,000? Who signed for the money? Who cashed the checks?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good question. The payment for the building at 252 was $399,925. I believe the rest was architectural and engineering fees, plans for bidding...you know, little details like that. It was going to be paid off over 40 years so it didn't really matter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 9:59, I would agree with you, if no one has seen the need for this investigation, a long time coming. The deeper the you look at how things were done, the worse things are. We as a town need answers. That is the only way, we can find solutions. A lot of people in town, have no clue as to how tough it is going to be in the next few years! They can be in denial, but the bottom line is, the truth is there for all to see. You may not want to see the truth, but you can not hide from it any longer. The sad part is, the trust you have had, in these people will be gone. Believe me, it is a bitter pill to swallow. Bev

      Delete
  7. Selectmen or 200 hundred registered voters can call for a special town meeting anytime they wish. State law says you must one annual town meeting between certain months, up to June 30, outside of that, anyother town meeting is referred to as a special town meeting where any subject or article can be brought forward. I think the point of doing it at annual town meeting in the past was because there was such little information put out prior to, there was little attendance at those meetings. That does not look as it will be repeated anytime soon. Townspeople are now paying attention to all meetings. Also past practice was to put hot button issue at the beginning of town meeting and something you wanted to "slide through" was put near the end of the warrant so fewer people would be there which equals less talk and opposition. Those are a few of past practices used. Anyone can look through old warrants (in annual town reports) and check the articles and the order of them, it just takes effort and time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. asking the AG to do an investigation is not sliding things in the back door it's asking the AG to do their job.

    ReplyDelete