Beer
www.nvtc.ee
Fluoride is a toxic waste that is purchased from countries like China and injected into our water supplies. The substance comes from the aluminum manufacturing process, of which it is a byproduct. Foreign countries are eager to sell us the toxic waste, as it is expensive to dispose of safely, and unlike in the United States, is not added to their public water supplies.
The sedative qualities of fluoride are inarguable, as it makes up roughly 94% of the drug Prozac. In addition to these behavioral effects is the increased risk of cancer linked conclusively to the toxin. So it goes without saying that with all the health and safety risks already associated with alcohol, throwing a cancer causing neurotoxin into the mix is certainly less than helpful, at least for those of us who don't have tons of a difficult to dispose of toxic waste substance laying around.
Luckily for those who'd like to leave cancer off the already lengthy list of alcohol dangers, lists have been compiled by like minded people, helping to inform the public of the fluoride content of their favorite beers, and hopefully factor this information into their purchasing choices. An excellent resource is the website ffbeers.com, which has published a list of the fluoride content of many popular beers, using the FL700 fluoride meter, made by ExStik.
Predictably, since almost all of Europe does not poison their water supply with fluoride, many beers brewed in Europe, such as Heineken, ranked comparatively low on fluoride content. An exception is the Italian beer Peroni, which was found by ffbeers.com to contain 0.9 ppm of fluoride. Fluoridated toothpaste contains roughly 1 ppm and displays a warning instructing you to contact poison control if more than a "pea sized amount" is ingested. So presumably, Peroni beer is just one tenth of a percentage point away from requiring one to contact poison control after drinking a bottle.
While non-thinkers and conformists continue to stubbornly insist that fluoride is "safe and natural," it is important to acknowledge the cynical manipulation of language they are using in order to make such a claim. Fluorine, from which all fluoride compounds are derived, is indeed listed on the table of elements and is a naturally occurring substance, albeit a poisonous one. However, sodium fluoride is really used as a catch all term for a number of varying substances, and the specific substance added to American water supplies is fluosilicic acid, which is of course, an unnatural toxic waste. All forms of fluorine are poisonous to the human body, naturally occurring or not.
Among the beers that scored well in ffbeers.com's list were those made by California's Sierra Nevada brewing company, who's beers contained little to no fluoride, which is consistent with their claim of using "pure water" during their brewing process.
You may wish to try a beer from Sierra Nevada, a Rye IPA called Ruthless.
The sedative qualities of fluoride are inarguable, as it makes up roughly 94% of the drug Prozac. In addition to these behavioral effects is the increased risk of cancer linked conclusively to the toxin. So it goes without saying that with all the health and safety risks already associated with alcohol, throwing a cancer causing neurotoxin into the mix is certainly less than helpful, at least for those of us who don't have tons of a difficult to dispose of toxic waste substance laying around.
Luckily for those who'd like to leave cancer off the already lengthy list of alcohol dangers, lists have been compiled by like minded people, helping to inform the public of the fluoride content of their favorite beers, and hopefully factor this information into their purchasing choices. An excellent resource is the website ffbeers.com, which has published a list of the fluoride content of many popular beers, using the FL700 fluoride meter, made by ExStik.
Predictably, since almost all of Europe does not poison their water supply with fluoride, many beers brewed in Europe, such as Heineken, ranked comparatively low on fluoride content. An exception is the Italian beer Peroni, which was found by ffbeers.com to contain 0.9 ppm of fluoride. Fluoridated toothpaste contains roughly 1 ppm and displays a warning instructing you to contact poison control if more than a "pea sized amount" is ingested. So presumably, Peroni beer is just one tenth of a percentage point away from requiring one to contact poison control after drinking a bottle.
While non-thinkers and conformists continue to stubbornly insist that fluoride is "safe and natural," it is important to acknowledge the cynical manipulation of language they are using in order to make such a claim. Fluorine, from which all fluoride compounds are derived, is indeed listed on the table of elements and is a naturally occurring substance, albeit a poisonous one. However, sodium fluoride is really used as a catch all term for a number of varying substances, and the specific substance added to American water supplies is fluosilicic acid, which is of course, an unnatural toxic waste. All forms of fluorine are poisonous to the human body, naturally occurring or not.
Among the beers that scored well in ffbeers.com's list were those made by California's Sierra Nevada brewing company, who's beers contained little to no fluoride, which is consistent with their claim of using "pure water" during their brewing process.
You may wish to try a beer from Sierra Nevada, a Rye IPA called Ruthless.
Selectman Ken Robinson had an interesting comment on fluoride and the Board of Health at town meeting. Selectman Robinson believes it is up to the Board of Health to oversee this poison in our water supply. The problem is that Ch 111 sec 8C allows the Board of Health to add fluoride to the water supply but it does not allow the Board of Health to take it out. This law is patently unfair and the reason Special Legislation was being sought.
ReplyDeleteI am afraid this information is too late to stop any damage, as the damage has already occurred. How else could you explain the refusal by residents of this town to refuse to place a notice that fluoride is in the town water, so that any resident in this town has that information. I am willing to bet there are people of all ages that to this day, do not know there is fluoride in their water. The withholding of this information to the users of town water may be illegal. How can you medicate people without their consent or awareness ?? Who is going to be responsible, when more information comes out in the future about the effects of this poison ?? Not Julie or Pete !! Not me !! We tried to tell you. Bev.
Delete