My Name is Paul H Cosentino. I started this Blog in 2011 because of what I believe to be wrongdoings in town government. This Blog is to keep the citizens of Templeton informed. It is also for the citizens of Templeton to post their comments and concerns.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Planning board express concern in heated meeting
A Planning Board hearing on the new Templeton Elementary School building grew contentious on Tuesday,ending with hints from some members that they may vote to REJECT the project or simply abstaining. An action the chairman Kirk Moschetti called a spineless way out.
One planning board member said he doesn't think questions have been answered adequately.
Issues with traffic flow and other issues with drainage retention ponds are just a coulple things.
When the idea for another review of traffic was suggested the chairman Moschetti said your wasting the taxpayers money and time. Being prudent and sure prior to a 50 million dollar vote is no waist for a project of this size.
Wouldn't the tax payer want to be sure all the data input was correct and double checked before the town changes the center of Templeton forever?
Would it be a second look may show a problem for traffic flow at a time when people least expected it?
For the school area to go from a population of only 170 to 517 will do doubt cause a higher amount of traffic. As we all have seen in the center of Gardner over the years change after change to curtail traffic flow problems will only alter issues and not correct the main problem of rush hour.
Templeton should be wise to the fact we have but one time to do this right if we don't do this right we won't need a planning board or the Moschetti's power struggle.
With at least 25-40% of the kids being dropped of by the parents that's a busy one way street for 2 hours at least per day. With only a short distance to exit the center of Templeton any one who came from south road to drop the kids will need to go back up Wellington again. Double the flow and on top of that if a backup happens stop all traffic, GRIDLOCK ,MELTDOWNS,BAD HAIR DAYS, not to mention cell phone call to work informing of a late arrival again.
So Mr. chairman who's waisted money is it you speak of and how much would it be for the study by a independent firm.
As for the town not getting a new school as Moschetti sees it.With the 25 million we will need to borrow we could build our own without the state dictators MSBA.
Templeton has been lured by those who say we have to do it this way or on that property or lose the MSBA support of less than half of the cost.
Without a bond rate or audits complete the state should be the first to see we do this right or it could all wind up in their laps.
Are we financially fit to do this or did the voters care to think about the towns future status.
Recievership is a very UGLY word to the town of TEMPLETON.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion being a member of any board or committee in town does not mean you just rubber stamp what ever comes your way. If you believe the project is wrong then it is your duty to vote it down not go along with the crowd so that you can remain a popular person. People in town had no problem letting the existing schools fall into disrepair so that the town would have few options when it came to doing something about our schools. In my opinion these people who let the schools fall into disrepair betrayed the sacred trust of taking care of what was already in existence. If you feel this project belongs elsewhere then vote no. If you knew more about public schooling you would think twice about placing a great deal of trust in this institution.
ReplyDelete1. Bianca, You Animal, Shut Up! : The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
ReplyDeleteBianca, You Animal, Shut Up!
Our problem in understanding forced schooling stems from an inconvenient fact: that the
wrong it does from a human perspective is right from a systems perspective. You can see
this in the case of six-year-old Bianca, who came to my attention because an assistant
principal screamed at her in front of an assembly, "BIANCA, YOU ANIMAL, SHUT
UP!" Like the wail of a banshee, this sang the school doom of Bianca. Even though her
body continued to shuffle around, the voodoo had poisoned her.
Do I make too much of this simple act of putting a little girl in her place? It must happen
thousands of times every day in schools all over. I've seen it many times, and if I were
painfully honest I'd admit to doing it many times. Schools are supposed to teach kids
their place. That's why we have age-graded classes. In any case, it wasn't your own little
Janey or mine.
Most of us tacitly accept the pragmatic terms of public school which allow every kind of
psychic violence to be inflicted on Bianca in order to fulfill the prime directive of the
system: putting children in their place. It's called "social efficiency." But I get this
precognition, this flash-forward to a moment far in the future when your little girl Jane,
having left her comfortable home, wakes up to a world where Bianca is her enraged
meter maid, or the passport clerk Jane counts on for her emergency ticket out of the
country, or the strange lady who lives next door.
I picture this animal Bianca grown large and mean, the same Bianca who didn't go to
school for a month after her little friends took to whispering, "Bianca is an animal,
Bianca is an animal," while Bianca, only seconds earlier a human being like themselves,
sat choking back tears, struggling her way through a reading selection by guessing what
the words meant.
In my dream I see Bianca as a fiend manufactured by schooling who now regards Janey
as a vehicle for vengeance. In a transport of passion she:
1 . Gives Jane's car a ticket before the meter runs out.
2. Throws away Jane's passport application after Jane leaves the office.
3. Plays heavy metal music through the thin partition which separates Bianca's
apartment from Jane's while Jane pounds frantically on the wall for relief.
4. All the above.
ReplyDeleteYou aren't compelled to loan your car to anyone who wants it, but you are compelled to
surrender your school-age child to strangers who process children for a livelihood, even
though one in every nine schoolchildren is terrified of physical harm happening to them
in school, terrified with good cause; about thirty-three are murdered there every year.
From 1992 through 1999, 262 children were murdered in school in the United States.
Your great-great-grandmother didn't have to surrender her children. What happened?
If I demanded you give up your television to an anonymous, itinerant repairman who
needed work you'd think I was crazy; if I came with a policeman who forced you to pay
that repairman even after he broke your set, you would be outraged. Why are you so
docile when you give up your child to a government agent called a schoolteacher?
I want to open up concealed aspects of modern schooling such
as the deterioration it forces in the morality of parenting. You
have no say at all in choosing your teachers. You know
nothing about their backgrounds or families. And the state
knows little more than you do. This is as radical a piece of
social engineering as the human imagination can conceive.
What does it mean?
One thing you do know is how unlikely it will be for any
teacher to understand the personality of your particular child or
anything significant about your family, culture, religion, plans, hopes, dreams. In the
confusion of school affairs even teachers so disposed don't have opportunity to know
those things. How did this happen?
Before you hire a company to build a house, you would, I expect, insist on detailed plans
showing what the finished structure was going to look like. Building a child's mind and
character is what public schools do, their justification for prematurely breaking family
and neighborhood learning. Where is documentary evidence to prove this assumption that
trained and certified professionals do it better than people who know and love them can?
There isn't any.
The cost in New York State for building a well-schooled child in the year 2000 is
$200,000 per body when lost interest is calculated. That capital sum invested in the
child's name over the past twelve years would have delivered a million dollars to each
kid as a nest egg to compensate for having no school. The original $200,000 is more than
the average home in New York costs. You wouldn't build a home without some idea
what it would look like when finished, but you are compelled to let a corps of perfect
strangers tinker with your child's mind and personality without the foggiest idea what
they want to do with it.
Law courts and legislatures have totally absolved school people from liability. You can
sue a doctor for malpractice, not a schoolteacher. Every homebuilder is accountable to
customers years after the home is built; not schoolteachers, though. You can't sue a
priest, minister, or rabbi either; that should be a clue.
If you can't be guaranteed even minimal results by these institutions, not even physical
safety; if you can't be guaranteed anything except that you'll be arrested if you fail to
surrender your kid, just what does the public in public schools mean?
What exactly is public about public schools? That's a question to take seriously. If
schools were public as libraries, parks, and swimming pools are public, as highways and
sidewalks are public, then the public would be satisfied with them most of the time.
Instead, a situation of constant dissatisfaction has spanned many decades. Only in
Orwell's Newspeak, as perfected by legendary spin doctors of the twentieth century such
as Ed Bernays or Ivy Lee or great advertising combines, is there anything public about
public schools.