Support elusive for proposed 'Gansett budget
Advisory Board agrees with selectmen on 'no' vote, cites
serious issues if district's full budget approved
|
|
|
Narragansett
Regional High School — the location for Friday’s Special Town
Meeting.
|
|
Kerry O'Brien
News Staff Writer
TEMPLETON — Evaluating the possible ramifications to the
town’s budget and the possible processes moving forward, the Advisory
Board unanimously voted Wednesday to recommend a “no” vote on the
Narragansett Regional School District’s budget at Special Town Meeting on
Friday, but said they want the meeting to allow the issue to be debated.
“If the voters are going to go one way, all the discussion in the world
isn’t going to change it,” said advisory board member Mary Lang. “But I
think there should be a good amount of discussion, if people take the
time to come they may allow at least 30 minutes of debate.”
Advisory board members said the town’s situation with the school — being
one of now only eight regional districts in the state to not have an
approved budget by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s
deadline of July 1 — could result in unusual outcomes.
“There are a bunch of options and these are very unused options,”
advisory board chairman Wilfred Spring said.
Under state law, the school district is being allowed to present the town
with their budget again because the Annual Town Meeting was not presented
with the option of voting their full recommended budget.
The school district has stated planned cuts of programs and staff, if
they don’t receive the additional $691,086 — a total of roughly $5.2
million— over the town’s approved appropriation of roughly $4.9 million.
If voters do end up approving the school’s full budget — despite the fact
an override was voted down at the polls twice — advisory board member
said it could lead to the dismissal of the entire police force and the
highway department.
“The selectmen made their recommendation of a “no” because this is an up
or down vote — if it’s a yes, it will be totally devastating to the
town,” said Mr. Spring. “With the money they’re talking about and the
possible devastation to the town, there needs to be discussion.”
“I don’t believe the school committee is doing themselves justice, or the
town justice, by pursuing this at this high of a level,” he continued.
“We asked them to move toward level funding and they didn’t listen.”
If municipal employees’ hours face cuts for another year in a row, advisory
board members said it could lead to the town being put under
receivership, or taken control by the state.
“It could put the nail in the coffin for the town to bring us into
receivership,” said advisory board member Garren Elwell. “I would venture
to say we’re flirting with it.”
If the town meeting doesn’t approve the school budget, the automatic next
step is a joint town meeting with Phillipston. With the Board of
Selectmen discussing a compromise with the school district: offering them
the option of presenting voters with a smaller override number, advisory
board members said another Special Town Meeting will result.
“This is still in the discussion stage, but the Town Administrator said
we can go for an override and have as many as six questions on the
warrant and just go from $100,000 to $200,000, $300,000 — and see what
the voters decide,” Mr. Spring said.
The special town meeting will be held will be held at 7 p.m. on Friday,
July 26 at the Narragansett Regional Middle School in Baldwinville.
|
|
|
Vote NO at the STM on Friday!
ReplyDeleteThere should be an amended motion, the override request should be a bit lower but I do not see any kind of an offer of level funding for administration costs, only reduction in service the affects the kids. I thought the concern was for the kids so why can't the labor costs be level funded at 2013 levels and let us work forward for next year. I am for and realize the town and the school needs an override but lets address some issues and have the talks that we all know we need. We cannot simply cut our way to good budgets because of inflation and other outside forces but we need a plan and a conversation, lets vote no and have that conversation. Nothing good will become of tearing the town apart and begin the process of bankrupting the town. Some may want this but please let us have the conversation that we desperately need. Lets also agree that we need a tax hike or some other increase in revenue (income) and no, the town cannot get a second or part-time job. A crusty old Marine once told me talk is cheap and good whiskey costs money. So if we want things or need things, we have to talk and come up with the means to have these things. This is not about the kids, it never is or never was. It is about the adults deciding on what they need versus what they want and the time has come to decide on what those are and how we do it. Time to be an adult and make a decision!! Lets let the kids be kids and not political footballs. Using the kids may be considered bullying in the 21st century!!
ReplyDelete