Paul working for you.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Ashburnham Westminster Joint Town Meeting


Ashburnham is pushed to boost school spending despite rejection of override


By Paula J. Owen, TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF



WESTMINSTER — Selectmen from Westminster and Ashburnham will meet Monday night to discuss the July 23 districtwide town meeting scheduled by the Ashburnham-Westminster Regional School Committee in a bid to get more school money from Ashburnham. 

Selectmen will also pick a moderator for the town meeting. 

The joint selectmen's meeting is open to the public and will take place in room 205 of Westminster Town Hall at 6:30 p.m. 

The school committee has not exercised its legal option to hold such a meeting in a decade, according to Superintendent Ralph E. Hicks. 

"The Ashburnham-Westminster Regional School Committee has the legal right to call a joint town meeting," Mr. Hicks said. "We're following state law that says when we don't have an agreed upon budget figure after two town meetings we have a right to have one last attempt to get the money." 


In a special election two weeks ago, Ashburnham voters rejected a $177,000 Proposition 2-1/2 tax cap override request, 763-527, that would have permanently increased taxes another 31 cents per $1,000 in home valuation to spare the jobs of three full-time teachers and a half-time teaching position at the high school. 

Westminster was able to fund its full assessment without seeking an override. 

However, Mr. Hicks said a total of $386,000 in cuts will have to be made to the schools after reducing Westminster's contribution proportionately if the $177,000 from Ashburnham isn't approved at the districtwide meeting. 

"Class size is a big issue," Mr. Hicks said. "We're trying to keep them reasonable. It is just a never-ending battle. We have 15 less teachers than we had in 2007 and haven't lost any students. It is just a slow erosion of teaching staff, and the school committee and I decided we can't tolerate that anymore. That is why we're asking folks to come to this regional meeting." 

No quorum is required at the July 23 meeting, to begin at 7 p.m. at Oakmont Regional High School, 9 Oakmont Drive. A simple majority of all the voters who show up from both towns is needed for the measure to pass. 

School committee members and a parents' group are working to let residents know about it, Mr. Hicks said. 

"Once we pass on money, it is gone forever and we feel we want a pretty efficient school district and are attempting to stay where we are and not slide back," Mr. Hicks said. 

Ashburnham Town Administrator Douglas C. Briggs, a former Rutland selectman for years who also worked as town administrator in Ashby, said it is the first time he has seen a school committee call a districtwide meeting after an override request failed. 

"The question is, why are they doing this," Mr. Briggs said. 

Through most of budget deliberations for the new fiscal year, which began July 1, the School Committee said it was looking from Ashburnham for a 2.5 percent increase, plus extra based on new growth, over last year's assessment. 

"We gave that to them," he said. "Then they came back and said, 'You know what? That's not enough. We need more.' We told them they would need to go for an override and if they got it, God bless them. If you don't, you'll have to make the cuts needed." 

He said he questions if the $177,000 is really needed. The school committee approved taking $550,000 from the $1.5 million available in its excess and deficiency account to help offset the budget, he said. Additionally, he said, the district is anticipating another $600,000 to replenish its excess and deficiency account from money left over from the last fiscal cycle. 

"They are anticipating a windfall of $600,000," Mr. Briggs said. "On the town-side, they are coming at us for $177,000 that will be coming out of town services." 

But, Mr. Hicks said, excess and deficiency money is needed for emergencies throughout the school year, and the district is allowed by law to maintain 5 percent of its budget in the account. 

"Any community or school district needs a decent amount of E&D to take care of any emergencies and money to carry into the next year," Mr. Hicks said. "We don't have the luxury of going back to the town in the middle of the year if something happens." 

As for voters, some in both towns are agitated about the school district's forcing the matter after the override was voted down. 

At a selectmen's meeting in Westminster last week, Westminster resident Keith J. Harding, who serves on the Capital Planning Committee, said he thinks it is unfair to voters, and such actions breed distrust in local government. 

"This is the kind of stuff that really irritates voters," Mr. Harding said. "Ashburnham followed the rules and had an override vote that didn't pass. Now they want to come back in the middle of the summer on July 23 for a special town meeting and have voters look at this?" 

He said it makes voters feel their vote doesn't count. 

"How many times do they have to say no?" Mr. Harding asked. "When does somebody listen? It is a one-way street stacked against the voter." 

Westminster Chairman Wayne R. Walker said he agreed 100 percent. 

"But we're in a regional district and they have this option and they are exercising it," Mr. Walker said. "We have to follow it." 

Contact Paula Owen at powen@telegram.com. Follow her on Twitter @PaulaOwenTG. 



Order the Telegram & Gazette, delivered daily to your home or office! www.telegram.com/homedelivery

Copyright 2013 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp.

2 comments:

  1. So I'm wondering why there is NO coverage of a similar issue in the Town of Templeton? How about it George? You think you could get permission to write an article about the upcoming STM on July 26th? You know, the STM where a vote may be taken to cut the entire police department in order to fund the school department's budget? That might be newsworthy. When people have to resort to reading Pauly's blog for important information which is usually printed in mainstream newspapers, don't wonder why the demise of newspapers is at hand.

    (THANK YOU Pauly for this blog)

    How about a full article like the one above, not the usual little blurb about Templeton!

    In Templeton's case the voters have said NO twice at the ballot box. To refresh our memories, the $691,000 override for the school was voted DOWN on April 30th and again on June 25th.

    Oh, and it gets better...BEFORE the vote on June 25th, the school committee re-certified the budget INCLUDING the same $691,000 assessment for Templeton on June 12th, while notifying the BOS on June 18th.

    According to law, the 45 day clock started ticking on June 12th. At the end of the the 45 days, IF the town, in this case the BOS, does NOTHING, then the school department assesses the town the $691,000 which will have to be cut from the town budget.

    Ashburnham and Westminster officials are upset about the school committee calling for a joint meeting after the voters rejected the override in Ashburnham... ONCE. Just imagine how upset these Ashburnham Westminster officials would be if their school committee voted to re-certify the assessment for Ashburnham and didn't notify the good people of Ashburnham for 6 days while a 45 day countdown were running. And at the end of that 45 day time period, Ashburnham would have to cough up an additional $177,000 out of their town budget.

    As background, Ashburnham passed an override to fund a new elementary which will open this Fall. Instead of saying "Thank you, Ashburnham" for supporting education by raising your taxes to fund a much-needed elementary school, Ashburnham is getting it tucked to them.

    Unlike Templeton, at least Ashburnham is being asked to the table via joint town meeting, before the robbery will occur.

    Just my opinions

    Julie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find it disappointing that Mr. Barnes has not covered any of the meetings, that are so important to the future of the town, and the pocketbook of the residents. Dogs and cats are nice and safe to write about, but does nothing to inform the people in this town, of what is going on. The town of Templeton is no longer a "Telegram Town", so where does one get the information needed to make a decision, or even know what is going on in town politics? The Blog, of course. A while back, I asked George if he read the blog. He said, once in a while, or something to that affect. I asked him how he knows what is going on?? Well, coverage does not have to be slanted, or one sided to be complete. Just the facts would be nice. The way the School Department is doing business, here and in Westminister/Ashburnham is unfair to the votes. No, is No, what part of that don't they understand?? I think it is time to contact the T&G to ask for coverage for our town. The paper is more than willing to take your money. It is time to give something back. Bev.

      Delete