Our Daily Dose
FLUORIDE NOMINATED FOR REVIEW FOR CARCINOGENICITY AND DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY & ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION
FLUORIDE NOMINATED FOR REVIEW FOR CARCINOGENICITY AND DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY & ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION
Source: Federal Register, Notice | October 7th, 2015 | National Institutes of Health
Nominations to the Report on Carcinogens and Office of Health Assessment and Translation; Request for Information
Summary
National
Toxicology Program (NTP) Office of the Report on Carcinogens (ORoC) and
Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) request information
on nine substances, mixtures, and exposure circumstances (collectively
referred to as “substances”). Six substances are nominated for possible
review for future editions of the Report on Carcinogens (RoC). Three
substances are being considered by OHAT for evaluation of non-cancer
health outcomes.
Table of Contents
Dates:
Deadline for receipt of information is November 6, 2015.
Addresses:
Information on substances for possible
review for the RoC should be submitted electronically on the ORoC
nominated substances page (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocnom) or to lunn@niehs.nih.gov. Information on OHAT nominations can be submitted electronically on the OHAT nominated topics page (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/763346) or to thayer@niehs.nih.gov.
For further information contact:
RoC Nominations: Dr. Ruth Lunn, Director, ORoC; telephone (919) 316-4637; lunn@niehs.nih.gov. OHAT Nominations: Dr. Kristina Thayer, Director, OHAT, telephone (919) 541-5021; thayer@niehs.nih.gov. Address for Dr. Lunn and Dr. Thayer: DNTP, NIEHS, 111 T.W. Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Supplementary Information:
Request for Information: The NTP requests
information on nine substances: Six substances have been nominated for
possible review for future editions of the RoC (see http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocnom) and three are under consideration by OHAT for evaluation of non-cancer health outcomes. (see http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/763346).
Specifically, NTP requests information on each substance regarding: (1)
Data on current production, use patterns, and human exposure; (2)
published, ongoing, or planned studies related to evaluating adverse
health outcomes (e.g., cancer, development,
reproductive, or immunological disorders); (3) scientific issues
important for prioritizing and assessing adverse health outcomes; and
(4) names of scientists with expertise or knowledge about the
substance—please include any bibliographic citations when available. NTP
will use this information in determining which substances to propose
for formal health hazard evaluations.
Six Substances Nominated for Possible Review for the RoC *
Flame Retardants
- Pentabromodiphenyl ether mixture (DE-71)
- Tetrabromobisphenol A, CASRN 79-94-7
Water Disinfection Byproducts
- Dibromoacetonitrile, CASRN 3252-43-5
- Di- and tri-haloacetic acids (as a class); specifically, those haloacetic acids with similar functional or structural properties that may cause similar health hazards
Other
- Fluoride, CASRN 7681-49-4
- Vinylidene chloride, CASRN 5-35-4
* Evaluations for the RoC may seek to
list a new substance in the report, reclassify the listing status of a
substance already listed, or remove a listed substance.
Three substances are being considered for OHAT evaluation of non-cancer health outcomes.
- Mountaintop removal mining (health impacts on surrounding communities)
- Neonicotinoid pesticides
- Fluoride (developmental neurotoxicity and endocrine disruption)
Information on RoC nominations should be submitted electronically on the ORoC nomination page (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocnom) or by email to lunn@niehs.nih.gov. Information on OHAT nominations should be submitted electronically on the OHAT nominated topics page (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/763346) or to thayer@niehs.nih.gov.
Public comments should include the submitter’s name, affiliation,
sponsoring organization (if any) along with appropriate contact
information (telephone and email). Written information received in
response to this notice will be posted on the NTP Web site, and the
submitter identified by name, affiliation, and/or sponsoring
organization.
Responses to this request for information
are voluntary. This request for information is for planning purposes
only and is not a solicitation for applications or an obligation on the
part of the U.S. Government to provide support for any ideas identified
in response to it. Please note that the U.S. Government will not pay for
the preparation of any information submitted or for its use. No
proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information should
be included in your response.
Background Information on ORoC: On behalf
of NTP, ORoC manages preparation of the RoC following an established,
four-part process (http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/rocprocess).
The RoC is a congressionally mandated, science-based, public health
report that identifies agents, substances, mixtures, or exposures
(collectively called “substances”) in our environment that pose a cancer
hazard for people in the United States. Published biennially, each
edition of the RoC is cumulative and consists of substances newly
reviewed in addition to those listed in previous editions. Newly
reviewed substances with their recommended listing are reviewed and
approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The 13th RoC,
the latest edition, was published on October 2, 2014 (available at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc13). The 14th RoC is under development.
Background Information on OHAT: On behalf
of NTP, OHAT conducts literature-based evaluations to assess the
evidence that environmental chemicals, physical substances, or mixtures
(collectively referred to as “substances”) cause adverse non-cancer
health outcomes. As part of these evaluations, NTP may also provide
opinions on whether these substances might be of concern for causing
adverse effects on human health given what is known about toxicity and
current human exposure levels.
Dated: October 1, 2015.
John R. Bucher,
Associate Director, National Toxicology Program.
• See Federal Register
In my opinion water fluoridation has been a big lie. Like most things in our life we have been told big lies for the benefit of the large corporations that run this country. Fluoride has always been a poison just like jumping out of an airplane at 5000 feet without a parachute is often harmful to our physical selves. It is hoped this will be the year that Templeton stands up for itself and adopts Special Legislation to help end water fluoridation.
ReplyDelete