A
Comment Worth Re-reading
The following article is
from Denise Andrews' FB page:
HOUSE REVIVES EDUCATION
BUDGET REVIEW COMMISSION
Through a budget amendment passed by the Massachusetts
House of Representatives, the Chapter 70 Foundation Budget Review Commission
will be revived for the first time since 2001. The commission, designed to
perform a systematic review of the state’s funding formula for education, will
be tasked with thoroughly analyzing state education spending and determining
whether current funding is adequate and used efficiently.
If also approved by the
Senate and signed by Governor Patrick, the measure would bring together key
legislators with representatives of associations of school committees,
superintendents, teachers, parent-teacher organizations, and regional and vocational
schools, to examine and make recommendations for legislation to improve the way
in which school foundation budgets are calculated.
"When the state
passed the Education Reform Act of 1993, the bill called for a complete review
of how the foundation budget was calculated at least once every four years,”
said Representative Lori Ehrlich (D-Marblehead), who filed the amendment with
the bipartisan support of 99 co-sponsors. “Unfortunately, this review has only
been completed twice since then, most recently in 2001. The needs of our
schools have changed dramatically in the 21 years since education reform was
passed, with the adoption of new curriculum frameworks, increased need for
special education and ELL programs, and changes in technology in the classroom.
There is also a renewed focus on the importance of early education. This study
will examine our current educational funding formula to ensure we are spending
our dollars wisely.”
“Taking this action is
critical to allow the Commonwealth to reevaluate the adequacy of education
funding and aid provided to the different cities and towns across the state,”
commented State Representative Denise Andrews (D-Orange). “The current model
was put in place twenty years ago with the best intention to ensure equity
across communities. Though, like any system, we need to circle back with
renewed focus to be sure it continues to meet its intent. I have heard the
concerns from many who work in our schools and those who balance budgets on the
local level regarding the need to rebalance our education dollars so that
students in less prosperous school districts have the same opportunities as
those in more affluent ones. I was proud to co-sponsor this amendment and have
long supported the underlying legislation to revive the foundation budget
review commission. This commission will take a 360-degree view of the needs of
students and school districts, incorporating the voices of regional schools,
vocational schools, school committees, parent-teacher organizations, teachers,
and administrators. Going forward, I will continue to engage to ensure we have
well-qualified leadership and representation to give voice to the concerns of
western Massachusetts and rural communities.”
continued...
“I am grateful that the House adopted this important amendment, which
will ensure a systematic and comprehensive reevaluation of the foundation
budget,” said Representative Alice Peisch, House Chair of the Joint Committee
on Education. “Such review will provide a critical opportunity to gain insight
on whether the current formula meets the needs of all students throughout the
Commonwealth, and will help us to identify ways to ensure the most effective
and efficient use of resources.”
The commission will include voting and advisory members, consisting of
elected officials, education officials, and designees of several groups,
including the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the American Federation of
Teachers, the Massachusetts Municipal Association, the Massachusetts Business
Alliance for Education, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, and
administrators of the Commonwealth’s technical and vocational schools. Before
presenting its report, the Commission will be required to hold at least four
public hearings around the state.
The Commission will be required to present their findings in a report on
or before June 30, 2015. In carrying out its mandate to review the best
available data and reports, as well as taking testimony from the public, the
commission would also examine at a number of factors seen as critical to
improving education. Among the factors to be considered are class size; special
education programs; preschool programs for 3 and 4 year olds; full-day
kindergarten; additional resources necessary to assure education opportunity
for low-income students; salaries necessary to attract and retain high quality
professionals; extracurricular programs; remedial programs for students at-risk
of failing to satisfy graduation requirements; and books, curriculum materials,
lab and technology equipment.
“The Commission will consist of people with different perspectives, but
the same goal – ensuring that every child in Massachusetts has access to a
world-class education,” said Rep. Ehrlich. “Our state’s historic education
reforms have cemented Massachusetts’ status as the nation’s leader in public
education. This re-evaluation of our funding priorities will be designed to
ensure that our schools remain global leaders as well.”
I hope
Templeton officials from both town and school will give testimony to this
review. This is a problem in many towns across the state, not unique to
Templeton and not all "Julie's fault" as some prefer to frame it. The
review of the formula has not been done since the implementation of state and
federal mandates including STEM, SPED and Common Core which is where many of
the unfunded mandates call for additional administrative costs. I just wish
town and school would work in tandem to solve this issue instead of promoting
the infighting to continue. To people
like Huff and Puff: just because people question the school budget doesn't mean
they're against the school or children. It’s fiscally responsible to
evaluate all financial matters in great detail...something that hasn't been
done in town in a long while. So, please
stop the name calling. I applaud your passion for education. Just make sure
your anger is directed in the right places. Or better yet, turn that anger into
something more positive. Throwing money
at the school system doesn't necessarily give your children a better quality
education. It makes education companies that lobby the government for these
mandates richer. I think all teachers would agree they'd rather spend their
time teaching and engaging with students rather than testing students and
filling out form after form.
Ashley
This is a good thing for every person in a small town like ours. It would not surprise me if they fond we could find better ways of providing educational services for our kids. Economically our taxpayers can not keep up with towns that have a industrial base or at least some commercial businesses to help out.The companies that provided support have gone. The Temple Steuart Company provided for the field behind NRHS. The tax dollars Temple Stuart provided along with the jobs, helped the economy of Templeton but they are all gone. Part of the reason Templeton is in the economic bind, that it is in now, is due to the drastic drop in State Aid in State Aid.that occurred back in 2002. Local aid was reduced by 125,000 from the estimate provided that spring. This was a chance for the town to come clean, and stop the destructive practices of using money from free cash, stabilization, or any account the Selectmen felt they could take from. The lack of good judgment has led ut to where we are today. Bev.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad someone else is aware of the Education Budget Review Commission. The work of this commission is critical and long overdue. Let's hope it becomes a reality.
ReplyDeleteI went to Boston on October 17th to testify on behalf of the the budget review commission as well as the devastating effects of the nuclear option. The Joint Committee on Education held a hearing on School Finance. I took a half day and went to the state house. The room was packed. Representatives from the MTA,MMA, MASC and business groups realize the need for this review of educational funding. I did not see anyone else there from Templeton. Or Phillipston.
The formula for school funding has never worked well. The underlying issue of socio economics is never addressed. News flash - Students in rich communities do better academically than students in poor communities who have less access to resources. Resources =$$$ ; Resources = access to technology. Resources = access to libraries. Resources = access to youth centers .
The formulas for minimum contributions, net school spending and target share are designed to pit towns against schools and schools against towns by placing the financial burden of funding education squarely on the backs of homeowners. The amount of revenue generated in taxation by adding new homeowners in a community doesn't begin to cover the costs of educating those homeowners kids.
I have no problem paying taxes to educate the kids in our community. I have voted to increase my taxes to fund the schools. I do have a problem with a school committee that will not compromise. In my opinion, the nuclear option is wrong. In my opinion, the nuclear option should NEVER be used. In my opinion, it should NOT be legal to turn 4 NO votes into a YES.
I do have a problem with school choice. School Choice is fools gold. It swaps out one set of funding problems for a different set of funding problems and doesn't address the underlying issues of inequity in funding for education.
Let's stay on top of this issue and be prepared to attend any and all hearings.
It would be nice to see some money in the budget for home schooled children. Many of these home school kids have excelled.
ReplyDeletePete Farrell.