Light and Water Vendor Checks
Light and Water Vendor Checks
Email correspondence between the Town Accountant and the TMLWP GM with the Treasurer stuck in the middle.
Email from John Driscoll to Treasurer
From: J Driscoll [mailto:jdriscoll@templetonlight.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:26 AM
To: townadministrator@templeton1.org; Holly Young (hyoung@templeton1.org); treasurer@templeton1.org
Cc: Dana Blais (snowfighter4@verizon.net); Gregg Edwards; Chris Stewart
Subject: Light & Water Vendor Warrant Checks
Good Morning to All,
The
TMLWP is looking into processing our own vendor warrant checks here at
the TMLWP Office. We have looked into the capability of our existing
accounting/billing hardware and software managed by ASA Tire and the
functionality exists. What we would like to do is process our light and
water vendor warrants (bi-weekly) into actual light and water checks on
check paper with our larger, tractor-fed printer. Once the checks are
created we would then bring them into the Selectmen’s Office to be
inspected by the Town Accountant and Town Treasurer to make sure these
vendor checks agree with the vendor warrants and can ultimately be
signed/stamped by the Treasurer. We don’t anticipate this taking any
longer than a few days, and after a period of time we would then
retrieve our vendor warrant checks that now have the Treasurer’s
signature/stamp. This will accomplish a few things:
1.
First, it will take the burden off of the Selectmen’s Office of
processing hundreds of extra vendor warrant checks for the TMLWP when
they already have several other departments’ vendor warrant checks to
handle.
2. Second, in the absence of a replacement full-time
administrative assistant in the Selectmen’s Office, this move by the
TMLWP could delay the need for them to hire another new person in their
office, at least temporarily.
3. Third, the burden will be on
the TMLWP to assure that all or our light and vendor warrant checks are
not only processed on time but also mailed on time. (Both the light and
water budgets include funding for postage to mail our corresponding
checks to vendors, so this should not be a Selectmen’s Office expense).
Should a mistake be made on the TMLWP side of this newer process it can
be corrected internally with the respective light or water vendor in a
timely fashion.
We are anticipating a “dry run” of this
newer process on one of the upcoming regular warrant days (4/30, 5/14,
5/28, etc.) so we would like to let the Selectmen’s Office know exactly
when, once we decide. This way their office will be expecting to look
over checks and warrants that have already been processed. We think
that this will be beneficial to both the TMLWP and the Selectmen; we
will be managing more of our own financial affairs so the Town can free
up their resources to manage their other town departments.
I
would appreciate any feedback that anyone may have on this matter,
preferably sooner than later, as we will be ordering up some light and
water checks.
Thank you.
John M. Driscoll
General Manager
Templeton Municipal Light and Water Plant
86 Bridge Street, P.O. Box 20
Baldwinville, MA 01436
Phone (978) 939-5323
Fax (978) 939-4309
Email from Treasurer to Accountant
From: treasurer [mailto:treasurer@templeton1.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:32 AM
To: 'Matthew Angell, CPA JD'
Subject: FW: Light & Water Vendor Warrant Checks
Please see below!
Kate Myers
Acting Treasurer
Town of Templeton
ph: 978.939.4475
fax: 978.939.4065
Accountant response
From: "accountant@templeton1.org"
To: jdriscoll@templetonlight.com
Cc: townadministrator@templeton1.org, "hyoung@templeton1.org" , "treasurer@templeton1.org" , snowfighter4@verizon.net
Date: April 28, 2014 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Fwd: FW: Light & Water Vendor Warrant Checks
John,
I am unable to reply to all
people on your e-mail list below, because I do not know their e-mail
address. Therefore, please forward a copy of this e-mail to them.
I
have reviewed your request (below) and determined that your proposal
will not reduce processing at the Town, but will increase costs for rate
payers. Here's why (in the same order as your request):
1. I am not convinced, because
all treasury and accounting duties will remain at the same level.
Currently, we process and audit invoice and payroll work. Your proposal
still requires the same level of processing in the accounting system and
auditing of the same amount of work.
2. I appreciation your concern
regarding the Selectmen's Office staffing; however, that office's
staffing has no bearing on processing and mailing invoices.
3. I'm not too concerned about
the general fund appropriation as of yet; however, we are about to
embark on determining a per-transaction cost to process payroll and
vendor payments. So, we will be reaching out to you in the future on
this issue.
What is not factored into your analysis is the added
steps by your department (which relate to reduced productivity or
increased cost). The added steps that would be required by your office
are someone must pickup the checks from Town Hall, prepare the checks
for mailing, and then mail the checks.
Because of the time
difference between your e-mail send date and the first projected run,
your office has already planned and purchased check stock, envelopes,
and other supplies. I hope that I am wrong, because that would be an
unnecessary expenditure. We're going to continue processing as we have always done before.
Let's steer away from this issue and talk about internal controls.
I have just become aware that original bank statements are being sent
to your office instead of the Treasurer's Office, where a photocopy is
being sent to the Treasurer. This practice increases risk to the
Treasurer, because she is not the holder of the original document. To
verify the accuracy of the bank statement, she would have to contact the
bank for another copy or go online to verify the balance. Your auditor
should have picked up on this issue, as they should be coming to the
Treasurer for copies of the original documents. But, I bet they are
happy to have reviewed the original document held by your office. Our
auditors will look negatively on this issue, as it increases their audit
risk. So, we're going to have the statements mailed to the Treasurer
and forward you copies. We will gladly open up our files to your auditors, and anyone who files a right-to-know request.
I also understand that your department may have access to wire funds from bank accounts. I am going to verify that this practice actually exists. If it does exist, then internal controls have broken down,
because one person has control over disbursements in the general
ledger, reconciliations of the general ledger, and control over wiring
funds out of bank accounts. To fix this issue, if it exists, we will
remove non-Treasurer personnel access to the bank account and all wired
funds will be processed by the Treasurer.
Best regards,
Matt
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI am glad that our Accountant has picked up problems that JD did not. As a town we do not need any more problems, so keeping all transactions above board is important. Bev.
DeleteThe last 2 paragraphs are the part that upset the General manager Driscoll the most. Clearly he was arrogant after the email was read by him and when he stated he could not be working with the Town on matters about the BOS office handle of the warrants.
ReplyDeleteLet's steer away from the issues and talk about internal controls.
What controls Dana?
Any idea?
Vote SMART
It is our business.
Control it!
If the commissioners wanted you to know what goes on at the TMLWP and how their doing business over there they should or would post on this blog. More people come here for information day in day out and get what they need to know about the issues they read about. It's sad the very few have made this a less open blog but the way they were posting it had to be changed to protect the viewers,today over 500 have come here to see whats posted and commented on. Few were removed and they know why. We hope to get the viewers trust back to what it use to be before we allowed the loss of control. Pauly is ok with the way the blog has been run and the new restrains we have added.
ReplyDeleteVote Smart