My Name is Paul H Cosentino. I started this Blog in 2011 because of what I believe to be wrongdoings in town government. This Blog is to keep the citizens of Templeton informed. It is also for the citizens of Templeton to post their comments and concerns.
Two days after the first COVID-19 vaccine was administered in the U.S. — to ahealthcare workerin Long Island, New York — two healthcare workers in Alaska who received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine experienced allergic reactions. One of those, a woman with no prior history of allergies, suffered an anaphylactic reaction andspent at least two nightsin the hospital.
The reactions, similarto those experiencedon Dec. 8, shortly after rollout of the samePfizervaccine in the UK, raise renewed concerns about the potential for life-threatening reactions to the vaccine. Concerns include the vaccine maker’s exclusion of people with severe allergies from the clinical trials, and the failure to pre-screen patients for polyethylene glycol (PEG), the compound suspected of triggering the reactions, before administering the vaccine.
An initialinvestigationinto the allergic reactions experienced by the two UK healthcare workers identified PEG as the likely trigger for those anaphylactic reactions.
In September, Children’s Health Defense’s chairman and chief legal counsel, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,warnedthe FDA about the potential for vaccines containing PEG — an ingredient used in the Pfizer andModernavaccines — to cause severe allergic reactions.
On learning Wednesday of the hospitalization of the woman in Alaska, Kennedy said:
“When we warned FDA Director Peter Marks that the nanoparticles in this vaccine pose deadly risks from anaphylaxis, he suggested we take our concerns directly to the vaccine makers. We clearly have a systematic problem when government health regulators have utterly abdicated their responsibility to safeguard public health and refer safety concerns about shoddily tested,zero-liability vaccinesto pharmaceutical companies.”
Vaccine makers have zero legal or financial incentive to make their products safe, Kennedy added. “Let’s remember that Pfizerwill make billionsso long as it keeps its vaccine in play, no matter how many people experience life-threatening reactions,” he said.
A spokeswoman for Pfizertoldthe Washington Post the company is “actively working with local health authorities to assess” what happened in Alaska. She also told the Post that prospective participants in Pfizer’s late-stage clinical trial were excluded if they had a history of severe allergic reactions associated with a vaccine or to any component of this vaccine.
Op-ed: It is time to protect kids’ developing brains from fluoride
Mounting evidence suggests fluoride may be hampering brain development and reducing kids' IQ. The US needs to rethink this exposure for pregnant women and children.
Half a Million Sharks Could Be Killed to Make Vaccine
Print
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Drug maker GlaxoSmithKline may need to slaughterhalf a million sharksto harvestsqualene, an oil made in shark livers, to make a new line of COVID jabs. Glaxo mixes squalene with a witches’ brew of proprietary surfactants to produce its controversial AS03 vaccine adjuvant. Adjuvants are compounds that amplify immune response to hyperstimulate the immune system. They are associated with a variety of autoimmune diseases.
Scientific studies have linked squalene adjuvants toGulf War syndromeand to a wave of debilitatingneurological disordersincluding epidemics of narcolepsy caused by Glaxo’s H1N1 Pandemrix vaccine during the 2009 swine flu “pandemic.” One study showed a13-fold increased riskof narcolepsy in children who received Pandemrix.
The devastating cascade of brain injuries to children and health care workers forced the termination of that Glaxo vaccine after European governments used only a small fraction of the jabs they had purchased from Glaxo. A recent studylinks squalene to carcinomas. In a bizarre and reckless twist, Glaxo has revived the dangerous adjuvant as its hall pass to the COVID-19 money orgy.
The company said it would manufacture a billion doses of this adjuvant for potential use in coronavirus vaccines. Around 3,000 sharks are needed to extract one ton of squalene.
Shark Allies, a California-based group, said Glaxo will kill around 250,000 sharks to make enough AS03 for the world’s population to receive one dose of its COVID-19 vaccine. If, as expected,two doses are needed, half a million sharks must die.
Glaxo declared that it would be producing 1 billion doses of AS03 “to support the development of multiple adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine candidates.”
Glaxo has developed partnerships with multiple companies, including its behemoth rival Sanofi, China’s Clover Biopharmaceuticals and Innovax Biotech in the city of Xiamen. Glaxo has also agreed to make the technology available to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations for COVID vaccines in Australia and elsewhere. Glaxo said it is focusing on what it considers a “proven technology” that will give the company “several shots on goal.”
Sign upfor free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Yoursupportis essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Childhood Cancer Caused Largely by Environmental Factors, Report Finds
By Jeremy Loffredo
For children in the U.S., cancer is theleading cause of deathfrom disease. Worldwide, cancer has become so prevalent and devastating that some may use the phrase “like curing cancer” when describing something unfeasible or highly complicated. Yet inSeptember,a team of more than 60 stakeholders and leaders in the health, science, business, policy and advocacy sectors collaborated to take a different, perhaps less flashy approach — preventing cancer, specifically by ending the use of toxic chemicals. Under the umbrella of theChildhood Cancer Prevention Initiative(CCPI), this collection of organizations published areportexamining the impact of different cancer-causing chemicals and calling for a “national plan” to address the rising incidence of childhood cancer.
In 2020, anestimated 1,806,590 new cases of cancerwill be diagnosed in the U.S. and 606,520 people will die from the disease, including an estimated 16,850 children and adolescents ages 0 to 19 being diagnosed and 1,730 children will die of the disease. Researchersestimatethat only 10% of all childhood cancers come from hereditary factors, meaning the lion’s share of childhood cancers come from environmental factors. To CCPI, this means 90% of all childhood cancer is preventable.
The authors of the report indicate that cancer charities and research organizations don’t devote enough resources to prevention.
“The vast majority of childhood cancer research funding goes towards studies of childhood cancer treatment and survivorship, leaving only a small portion for the critical work on prevention,” the report explains.
The CCPI report identifies pesticides, traffic-related air pollution and paints/solvents as the three groups of chemicals giving rise to the most common types of childhood cancer.
Dr. Paul Connett: “While we wait to
prove our case in court, I urge everyone, including scientists, doctors,
journalists and public health officials to read these four papers and
not simply take the word of fluoridation promoters on the evidence. The
risk to our children’s developing brains is so great it is
unconscionable to delay warnings to pregnant women and parents.”
Four Studies That Show Adding Fluoride to Drinking Water Unnecessarily Endangers Children’s Brains
March 27th, 2020
Dr. Paul Connett, PhD, director of FAN, says of the scientific evidence:
“As of 2020 there have been 72 fluoride-IQ studies, of which 64 found a lower IQ among
children with higher fluoride exposure. Many of the earlier studies
were in places with elevated natural fluoride levels. There is now very
strong evidence that fluoride damages both the fetal and infant brain at
the levels used in artificially fluoridated areas.”
“You only have to read four studies to realize that
deliberately adding fluoride to drinking water unnecessarily endangers
children’s brains. Three* of these four studies were funded by the
National Institutes of Health.”
The first* came in Sept 2017 with a groundbreaking study from Mexico City.
This study found a strong association between the amount of fluoride
women were exposed to during pregnancy and lowered IQ in their
offspring.
The second* came in 2019 when a study published in JAMA Pediatrics essentially replicated the Mexico City finding in Canadian communities.
The third* came in 2019 and found a staggering 284% increase in the prevalence of ADHD among children in fluoridated communities in Canada compared to non-fluoridated ones.
The fourth* came in 2020, when it was reported that children who were bottle-fed in fluoridated communities in Canada lost up to 9 IQ points compared to those in non-fluoridated communities.
Dr. Paul Connett: “While we wait to
prove our case in court, I urge everyone, including scientists, doctors,
journalists and public health officials to read these four papers and
not simply take the word of fluoridation promoters on the evidence. The
risk to our children’s developing brains is so great it is
unconscionable to delay warnings to pregnant women and parents.”
I played a little experiment on my grandchildren
who live with me. My granddaughter is 12 and my grandson is 10.
One day during the RNC, I was watching and my grandson walked through the
living room while Trump was speaking. He said, "I hate Trump." I was
shocked. I said, "Why do you hate Trump?" He said, "Everyone
hates Trump." I asked, "Who?" He gave me the name of one of his
friends. I said, "Oh really. Why does he hate Trump?" He said,
"Trump took his house." I told him, "The president doesn't take
houses." He said, "Well he took my friends. I saw it." I let it
go then but decided to do a little experiment.
The next day I sat him and his sister down. I asked if they were Republican or
Democrat. My Granddaughter said Republican. The little Trump hater didn't even
know what I was talking about. I said, "You told me you hated Trump so you
must be a Democrat because Trump is a Republican." He agreed with that. I
told him he better be sure because he had to be a Democrat for four years if
that's what he chooses. He agreed.
I told them I had some work for them to do and I would pay them. Their job was
to pick up sticks in the yard for 10 dollars, but I would pay him as a Democrat
and her as a Republican. They cleaned up the yard both working really hard
because they were getting paid. When I paid them, I gave her $8.00 and him
$6.50. He said, "Hey, why does she get more than me?" I told him,
"You're a Democrat your taxes are more." He said, "I want to be
a Republican." I told him, "Remember what I said. If you decide to be
a Democrat you'll have to be one for four years. You'll be 14 before you can
change." He wasn't happy with that answer but didn't argue.
The next day I sent them out to do another job. When they finished I paid her
$8.00 and him $5.50. Again, he complained because he got less than the day
before. I said "Your Democrat party just made everyone buy medical
insurance so you have more coming out of your check. But Trump wants to fix
that."
The third day, I sent them out to do another job. Again, I gave her $8.00 and
gave him $4.50. He just glared at me across the table. I said "Oh I'm
sorry were you expecting more? Well, your Democrat party decided that Jose
needs a new pair of Nike's." His mouth flew open and he said, "Who
the heck is Jose?" "He's an immigrant from Mexico, and since he
doesn't have a job, you'll have that much taken out of your check every day
until he finds one and can take care of himself."
Day four and I'm loving this experiment. Once again, I give them work and give
her $8.00 and him $4.00. Being the little smart ass that he is he said,
"Let me guess Jose needed a new shirt." I replied, "No, your
Democrat city was burned and looted by Democrat thugs and you're going to have
to pay for it until the city is rebuilt. You see, the Democrats don't believe
in law and order and want to defund the police so no one was there to stop the
thugs."
Day five final day of torture. He wasn't too happy this day. The longer he
worked the less he got paid. He sat down at the kitchen bar all grumpy and his
sister was all smiling. He said, "So what do we have to do today?" I
answered, "Your sister is going to water the flower beds but you lost your
job." He said, "What? I can't make any money today?" I told him,
"I'm sorry but Jose needed a job, and since he is willing to work for
less, I'm going to have to let you go. It may be a long time before you find
another job because your Democrat party just let another bunch of immigrants
into the country and they will all be looking for jobs. However, if you would
be willing to work for $2.00 I can keep you." He stormed out of the
kitchen and said, "It sucks being a Democrat." I yelled after him,
"That's why the smart people all vote for Trump.
Riddell 2019 Study: Fluoride in Water Linked to ADHD Symptoms and Diagnoses
April 1st, 2020
A paper published by in 2019 by Riddell et. al, “Association
of water fluoride and urinary fluoride concentrations with attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder in Canadian youth“, found
that exposure to higher levels of fluoride in tap water is associated
with an increased risk of ADHD symptoms and diagnosis of ADHD among
Canadian youth, particularly among adolescents.
Above Video: Game-Changing Fluoride Neurotoxicity Study #3: Riddell 2019
“We found that Canadian youth exposed to higher tap water
fluoride levels had a higher risk of receiving an ADHD diagnosis and
reported more symptoms of hyperactivity and inattention. Specifically,
an increase of 1.0?mg/L in water fluoride concentration was associated
with a 6.1 times higher odds of an ADHD diagnosis after accounting for
potential confounding variables, such as exposure to second-hand smoke,
household income, and blood lead level. Likewise, water fluoride
concentration was positively associated with hyperactive/inattentive
symptoms, especially among older youth.”
It is our sole aim to present this complex scientific information in a non-biased, easy to understand way, so that we can all learn to use wireless technologies safely. We have researched medical and scientific information so you don’t have to (although we encourage independent investigation too!).
Wireless Education e-learning courses – safer use of wireless technology
Oure-learning coursesare geared toward children, teenagers, parents, teachers, medical staff, occupational health professionals, technology specialists, corporate risk managers, general employees and legal experts. They can be delivered on multiple platforms for global distribution.
We have been able to create these courses through the volunteer efforts of manyscientistsandspecialistsaround the world, and through the start-up capital of socially minded business entrepreneurs.
As a not-for-profit charity, social responsibility is at the heart of what we do. Any surpluses are re-invested to keep the cost of these courses very low, create new courses, and make them available in multiple languages through our global network.
“A wifi
classroom is like the inside of a microwave oven set at very low power.
Children are exposed to that wifi radiation six hours every school day,
five days a week, and for several months during the year.” - Magda Havas, Associate Professor of Environmental and Resource Studies, Trent University, Canada
GENERATION ZAPPED investigates the potential dangers of prolonged
exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) from wireless technology; its effects
on our health and well-being, as well as the health and development of
our children. From its links to breast and brain cancer, to its
associations with increased infertility and genetic mutations related to
autism and ADHD, to newly developed illnesses, such as Electrical
Hyper-Sensitivity (EHS).
0
