Paul working for you.

Friday, November 16, 2018

Open Letter to Nutritionists About the Fluoride Deception

Open Letter to Nutritionists About the Fluoride Deception


Dental dogma and authoritative pronouncements aside, fluoride is not a nutrient of any kind - essential, non-essential or micronutrient. Consumption does not provide any dental benefit, and there is no such thing as a fluoride deficiency. Fluoride is best characterized as a poison that is used as a drug in a misguided attempt to prevent cavities.

The following is an open letter from a cross section of organizations who recognize that the fluoride deception* which has primarily focused on deceiving politicians and the public is also targeting nutritionists. This effort is especially reprehensible in the light of several National Institute of Health sponsored studies published in 2017 and 2018 validating that even low doses consumed by pregnant women, bottle-fed infants, and others in optimally fluoridated communities can result in thyroid disease and subtle but permanent brain damage in many vulnerable consumers.
* ‘The Fluoride Deception’ is the title of a 2004 expose by investigative journalist Christopher Bryson that details the seedy origins of fluoridation policy.

To Professionals, Politicians and Public:
Empirical data and scientific studies from the 21st century have proved beyond doubt that not only does fluoride have no place in the human diet but also that fluoridation policy is a public harm policy.
Major findings from evidence-based science relevant to dietary fluoride confirm:
1. Dental damage from youthful consumption of fluoride
2. Neurological damage from prenatal, youthful and long term exposure to fluoride
3. Biological damage to endocrine, immune, renal, gastrointestinal and other systems
4. Bone damage from long term exposure and exposure during critical growth periods
5. Increased risk of complications during pregnancy affecting both mother and child
6. Disproportionate harm to various vulnerable populations due to ethnicity, age, health conditions, genetics or epigenetics.
We, the undersigned, attest to having done our due diligence in studying the effects of fluoride consumption and/or fluoridation policy on people and planet. We have concluded that there is no ethical or medical justification for including fluoride on any nutritional list nor for dosing municipal water supplies with corrosive and contaminated fluoridation products in order to mass medicate the public.

Dental damage
In the United States where approximately 75% of the population consumes fluoridated tap water, over half of all adolescents have dental fluorosis. Dental fluorosis is also high and rising in non-fluoridated municipalities due to the ‘halo’ effect from food and beverages prepared with fluoridated water as well as from exposure to fluoridated pesticides in foods and fluoridated dental products. Severe fluorosis includes pitting, misshapen teeth and missing enamel. One in five American teenagers has moderate to severe damage on least two brittle teeth many of which will likely require costly veneers or crowns due to childhood fluoride consumption. Dental fluorosis is correlated with increased cavities, periodontal disease and other dental expenses.

Neurological damage
Prenatal and youthful exposure predict increased incidence of learning disabilities in dozens of human and hundreds of laboratory studies. A recent NIH sponsored study validated a doseresponse trend line for lowered IQ in offspring based on maternal dose within the dose range typical in optimally fluoridated communities. Only a handful of studies, each of which has severe limitations, claim not to have found neurological harm. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lists fluoride as a water contaminant and as a ‘gold standard developmental neurotoxicant.’ Fluoride binds with heavy metals such as lead and aluminum, as well as enhancing the absorption of those metals into blood and brain. The pineal gland deep in the brain becomes calcified from chronic exposure to fluoride. The pineal gland governs sleep patterns and reproductive hormones. Fluoride is also associated with increased risk of neurodegenerative disease.

Biological damage
Fluoride lowers iodine levels and can disrupt thyroid function. Fluoride is a particular burden to kidneys which in a healthy adult excrete about 50% of intake, the remainder being sequestered in tissue and bone. Fluoride is an adjuvant which intensifies the immune response in the presence of an antigen, i.e. it worsens or causes allergies and symptoms of autoimmune disease. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and atherosclerosis in the heart are manifestations of fluoride damage. Crohn’s disease and other irritable bowel conditions can be caused or worsened by fluoride. Gastrointestinal cancers in particular have been observed to be higher in fluoridated communities. Fluoridation predicts increased age-related diabetes, as does frequent use of OTC dental rinses, essentially all of which are fluoridated. Dermal absorption contributes to systemic exposure which affects biological systems.

Bone damage

Trouble in paradise?


School closings

School closings and delays for Massachusetts for Friday, Nov. 16

Thursday, November 15, 2018

Winter Weather

Winter Weather


 

SoCal Fire May Have Ejected "Incredibly Dangerous" Radioactive Particles Into The Atmosphere

SoCal Fire May Have Ejected "Incredibly Dangerous" Radioactive Particles Into The Atmosphere



Remember this?










Looks like the 131 homes and businesses affected by the explosions won't have to pay taxes until December 15, 2018 on property that no longer exists!



Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Can You Really Be Allergic to Wi-Fi and Cell Phones?


Can You Really Be Allergic to Wi-Fi and Cell Phones?

Along with the incredibly fast increase in our use of wireless technologies, the number of people who claim getting health symptoms from exposure to Wi-Fi, cell phones or other sources of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) is on the rise.

And while the current scientific “consensus” is that this non-ionizing radiation cannot possibly induce health effects besides overheating tissues, an increasing number of independent scientists and doctors are ringing the alarm.

“Will We All Become Electrosensitive?”

In a 2006 letter to the editor of the journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine,[1] researchers Örjan Hallberg from Sweden and Gerd Oberfeld from Austria shared their concerning observations:
“Each year an increasing number of people claim to suffer from electrosensitivity, also known as being electrically hypersensitive (EHS). There are also other diseases, such as fibromyalgia and burn-out syndrome, that have symptoms similar to those exhibited by people suffering from electrosensitivity.”
And they ended with a pretty damning prediction:
“Contrary to the views of mainstream medical authorities, [our data] shows that the group of electrosensitive people around the world, including Sweden, is not just a small fraction that deviates from the rest of the healthy population. Instead, it points at the possibility that electrosensitivity will be more widespread in the near future. The extrapolated trend indicates that 50% of the population can be expected to become electrosensitive by the year 2017.”
Electrosensitivity prevalance.
image link

Is “Evidence-Based Medicine” Blinded By Bad Science?

In the last few decades, many researchers attempted to elucidate whether electro hypersensitivity (EHS) is a real medical condition, or if the nocebo effect could be responsible for the symptoms displayed by people who claim they are sensitive.
Several provocation studies using cellular base stations or cell phones against a sham have been mostly inconsistent.
In a 2015 aggregation of two such large studies,[2] researchers concluded:
“These findings are consistent with a growing body of literature indicating there is no causal relationship between short-term exposure to EMFs and subjective well-being in members of the public whether or not they report perceived sensitivity to EMFs.”
But as researcher Dariusz Leszczynski reported in recent presentation he gave in Seoul, South Korea,[3] these studies have been designed with a lot of dangerous assumptions, making them virtually irrelevant to elucidate the truth around EHS.
  • Scientists do not know if volunteers participating in studies have the correct self-diagnosis of EHS
  • Scientists have no proof that the methods they using are indeed capable of detecting EHS
  • Scientists introduce biases by excluding volunteers with pre-existing health problems (and a lot of people who claim being EHS suffer from important symptoms)
In other words, provocation studies mostly designed by psychiatrists and trying to prove that EHS is “all in the head” should not be taken as proof that our exposure to EMFs cannot possibly cause symptoms.
Leszczynski proposes that instead of merely turning a cell phone ON and OFF and seeing if a person reacts, we should be on the lookout for tangible biological markers in people who claim they are EHS.

French Doctor Detects Reliable Biomarkers of Electro Hypersensitivity

Social Media Linked To Loneliness And Depression, New Study Finds

Social Media Linked To Loneliness And Depression, New Study Finds

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

Voter ID ?

Voter ID ?

Provisional Ballot Boxes Discovered Inside AVIS Rental Car At Ft. Lauderdale Airport

Provisional Ballot Boxes Discovered Inside AVIS Rental Car At Ft. Lauderdale Airport

Monday, November 12, 2018

Meetings the Week of November 12, 2018

Meetings the Week of November 12, 2018
 


Tuesday   11/13/18
Assessors                  PCS Town Hall*                    4:00 pm
Monty Tech               Fitchburg                            6:00 pm
Cap. Planning           PCS Town Hall*                  6:30 pm 
Planning                   PCS Town Hall*                     6:30 pm
Historical


Wednesday 11/14/18
Housing                          Bridge St                                4:00 pm
Scout Hall                      PCS Town Hall*                    6:00 pm  

Assessors                       PCS Town Hall*                    6:30 pm
BOS                               PCS Town Hall*                    6:30 pm


Cultural Council             PCS Town Hall*                        6:30 pm
Monty Tech                    Fitchburg                                     7:00 pm   

Thursday 11/15/18

Elem. Disposal                PCS Town Hall*                        5:30 pm
Adv. Com.                       PCS Town Hall*                         6:30 pm
      
         
  


* Pauly Cosentino Sr. Town Hall 

Generation Zapped...Wifi, Smart Meters, EMF -oh my!

Generation Zapped

Doc & Talk: Generation Zapped

Tue Nov 13th 6:30pm - 8:00pm
Library Auditorium 
50 Pleasant St, 
Winchendon, MA 01475, USA 
DOCUMENTARY FILM AND DISCUSSION SERIES 10.29.18

Join us November 13th at 6:30pm for our Doc & Talk. 

Showing: Generation Zapped with a Discussion of the film will follow.

About Movie: GENERATION ZAPPED investigates the potential dangers of prolonged exposure to Radio Frequencies (RF) from wireless technology; it’s effects on our health and well-being, as well as the health and development of our children.


RFK Jr. wins case against U.S. government for vaccine safety violations

RFK Jr. wins case against U.S. government for vaccine safety violations



Image: RFK Jr. wins case against U.S. government for vaccine safety violations
(Natural News) Del Bigtree, founder of Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), teamed up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to take on the U.S. government by filing suit against the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for vaccine safety violations — and they won. This is big news for all concerned with the topic of vaccine safety. It turns out the federal agency has been neglecting their vaccine safety obligations for over 30 years. The lawsuit brought by RFK Jr. is evidence that “vaccine safety” as we know it is nothing more than a sham.

Government agencies charged with protecting the public are not doing their part to ensure and improve the safety of immunizations, but will they be held accountable?

RFK Jr. and ICAN take on DHHS

As sources explain, a clause in the The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NVICA) compels DHHS to take responsibility for improving vaccine safety and efficacy, and charges the agency with constant monitoring and improving of adverse event reporting. The Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines clause also tasks DHHS with providing a report on improvements made in these areas to Congress every two years.

RKF Jr. and ICAN reportedly suspected that DHHS was failing to meet this responsibility, and filed a Freedom of Informtation Act request to obtain the records of these biennial reports. For eight months, DHHS tried to blockade their request and refused to provide information. Ultimately, a lawsuit had to be filed.
As a document from ICAN reads:
ICAN was therefore forced to file a lawsuit to force HHS to either provide copies of its biennial vaccine safety reports to Congress or admit it never filed these reports. The result of the lawsuit is that HHS had to finally and shockingly admit that it never, not even once, submitted a single biennial report to Congress detailing the improvements in vaccine safety. This speaks volumes to the seriousness by which vaccine safety is treated at HHS and heightens the concern that HHS doesn’t have a clue as to the actual safety profile of the now 29 doses, and growing, of vaccines given by one year of age.

Friday, November 9, 2018

Fluoridated Water Can Calcify Arteries, Study Finds

Fluoridated Water Can Calcify Arteries, Study Finds

Fluoridated Water Can Calcify Arteries, Study Finds

Fluoride is put in your drinking water 'for your teeth' without your consent, but did you know that it could also be calcifying your arteries?

A few years ago, we reported on a study evaluating a new diagnostic technology that inadvertently revealed a link between fluoride exposure and coronary artery disease. Our report stirred up quite a lot of controversy and criticism, even leading one of the most respected figures in alternative medicine (deservedly so) – Dr. Russell Blaylock -- to call us out on Infowars for our allegedly sophomoric interpretation of the following article: "Association of vascular fluoride uptake with vascular calcification and coronary artery disease." As one can see, the study's results revealed a hitherto largely unknown connection between fluoride exposure, coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events (e.g. heart attack).
"There was significant correlation between history of cardiovascular events and presence of fluoride uptake in coronary arteries. The coronary fluoride uptake value in patients with cardiovascular events was significantly higher than in patients without cardiovascular events."
The argument, at the time, was the study was simply about a new diagnostic technique and shouldn't be 'read into,' and that, presumably, the increased fluoride uptake value observed in patients with a higher frequency of cardiovascular events was a an 'effect' of the heart disease itself and not in any way indicative of fluoride's causative role as a cardiotoxic agent -- despite the fact that fluoride's cardiotoxicity has already been consistently demonstrated in the biomedical literature.

Now, a provocative new study published in the journal Toxicology not only provides some vindication for our previous interpretations, but also raises serious concern over the cardiovascular complications associated with water fluoridation practices, showing for the first time that despite exhibiting an anti-calcification effect in vitro (cell model) fluoride exposure at levels found in people who drink fluoridated water exhibits artery-calcifying effects in the more important in vivo (animal) model.


Titled, "Effect of water fluoridation on the development of medial vascular calcification in uremic rats," the study opens with a description of the common medical justification for public water fluoridation:
"In order to improve dental health in the population, fluoride is included in tooth pastes and mouthwash solutions or is added to public water supplies at 0.5–1.5 mg/L (WHO, 2008), which has been a common practice in some countries since 1945."
And yet, the study acknowledges that fluoride is a well-established toxicant that our body has to either incorporate into its tissues or excrete through the kidney's to sequester or eliminate:
 "More than 90% of ingested fluoride is absorbed through the intestine and quickly distributed between plasma/soft tissues and calcified structures, where it can be sequestered for years (Buzalaf and Whitford, 2011). When water is fluoridated at the WHO- recommended levels, the range of plasma fluoride concentration is usually 1–6 uM (Husdan et al., 1976; Singer and Ophaug, 1979). Fluoride is not under homeostatic control, and it is cleared from the plasma within few hours by the complementary action of calcified tissues and the kidneys."
Those with chronic kidney disease have a harder time clearing the fluoride, which results in increased blood plasma levels, especially as the length of exposure increases.

The study noted that in healthy people, almost without exception, fluoride accumulates in the aorta, and in the elderly can exceed 100 ug/g [microgram/gram] tissue. Since atherosclerosis involves the gradual hardening and final calcification of the arteries with a form of calcium known as hydroxylapatite, fluoride's role in replacing hydroxyls within hydroxylapatite crystals to form fluorapatite can be considered enhancing the cardiotoxicity of these calcium deposits due to the fact that fluorapatite is less soluble than hydroxylapatite and therefore more resistant to the body's demineralization mechanisms (or de-calcification with natural substances such as magnesium, hawthorn or vitamin K2). The authors address this point:

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Sessions Is Out:

Sessions Is Out: Was Told Wednesday That Trump Wanted Him To Resign

Midterm election numbers for Greater Gardner

Midterm election numbers for Greater Gardner

 

Monday, November 5, 2018

Teachers Are Serving As First Responders To The Opioid Crisis

POLITICS
11/03/2018 05:00 am ET

Teachers Are Serving As First Responders To The Opioid Crisis

“My job as a teacher is to be a first responder to poverty,” says Greg Cruey, a middle school teacher at Southside K-8 school. “If my students learn other stuff too, that’s great.”