Lower IQ?

 

New study finds fluoride lowers IQ at exposures similar to artificially fluoridated water and genetics  can cause heightened vulnerability The latest epidemiological study finding an association between fluoride exposures and reduced IQ in  children was at exposures in the same range as occur in areas with artificial water fluoridation.  T he study by Zhao et al (2021), conducted in China in a large group of 567 children, found substantially  lower IQ scores amongst those with greater fluoride exposure.  Child urine fluoride levels of 1.5 mg/L  were estimated to have a -6.5 IQ points* loss compared to children with urine fluoride levels of 0.5 mg/L.   The average urine fluoride concentration in the study was 1.0 mg/L, which is only slightly higher than the  average 0.7 mg/L urine fluoride levels found in studies of people residing in artificially fluoridated parts of  Canada and the US, and substantially less than the maximum levels [Green 2019, Uyghurturk 2020].  In t he Canadian study fluoridated water averaged 0.6 mg/L and in the US study it averaged 0.7 mg/L   The new Zhao et al study clearly supports FAN’s own recent dose-response assessment of over a dozen  higher quality studies of fluoride and IQ, which found a consistent statistically significant loss of IQ even at  exposures of 0.7 mg/L and below. This new study is also important because it confirms findings from two previous studies which found that  people with some specific genetic variations affecting neurodevelopment are especially susceptible to loss  of IQ from fluoride exposure.  Those previous papers were by Zhang et al (2015) and Cui et al (2018), and  they found 5-fold and 4-fold greater loss of IQ for people with specific variants in two genes.  The new  paper extends the findings by looking at four different genes simultaneously, and evaluating the interactions  between the genes and between fluoride and IQ.  All four genes are known to affect neurodevelopment,  acting through the neurotransmitter and hormone dopamine, according to Zhao et al.  The study found that  certain combinations of variants in the four genes produced much greater susceptibility to loss of IQ from  fluoride exposure, similar to what had been found in the single gene studies of Zhang and Cui, but  revealing a more complicated relationship that depends on interactions between several genes. Children with susceptible gene variants harmed most The genetic variations are naturally occurring and each variant typically exists in a sizable proportion of the  population, so these are not rare genetic conditions associated only with certain rare diseases.  The technical term for these variants are Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms or SNPs.   This is the first time multiple gene effects have been looked at with fluoride neurotoxicity, but the findings  are not unexpected because similar multiple-gene interactions have been found to effect loss of IQ from the  neurotoxin mercury.  A large cohort study in England found that children with a combination of the most  susceptible variants of genes lost a stunning 25 IQ points from higher mercury exposures, whereas the  overall average loss of IQ for all children with all combinations of variants was too small to even detect  [Grandjean 2013 video by IAOMT, Julvez & Grandjean 2013, Julvez et al 2013].  If a similar genetic  dependence of susceptibility to fluoride exists, this may explain why in some fluoride neurotoxicity studies a  few individual subjects showed much greater effects than the average.  The Bashash 2018 and the   Green 2019 studies considered these extreme cases as possible outliers, but found that even excluding  them did not alter the finding that the remaining subjects still showed clear associations between fluoride  and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.   The implications for public health policy of genetic variation in vulnerability to fluoride are substantial  [Julvez & Grandjean 2013].  An exposure level that might produce a relatively small adverse effect on most  people could be causing a very great adverse effect on a genetically susceptible subset of the population.   Regulations to prevent harm must be tailored to the most vulnerable, not the average, because there is no  practical way to know in advance who is most susceptible and water fluoridation is mass-medication that  cannot accommodate individual variations in response. Chris Neurath Research Director Fluoride Action Network