Here's the Next Crisis "Nobody Saw Coming"
When
borrowing become prohibitive (or impossible) and raising taxes no
longer generates more revenues, state and local governments will have to
cut expenditures.
Strangely
enough, every easily foreseeable financial crisis is presented in the
mainstream media as one that "nobody saw coming." No doubt the crisis visible in these three charts will also fall into the "nobody saw it coming" category.
Take a look at this chart of state and local government debt. As we noted yesterday, nominal GDP rose about 77% since 2000. So state and local debt rose at double the rate of GDP. That is the definition of an unsustainable trend.
As noted earlier in the week, state and local taxes have soared 75%.
While this would be no big deal if wages and salaries had risen by 75%
in the same time frame, but earnigns have barely kept pace with
inflation (38% since 2000).
So state and local taxes have risen at a rate twice that of wages/salaries. State and local governments can keep raising taxes, but where's the money going to come from?
State and local government expenditures have risen faster than inflation or GDP.
Here is the context that matters: household income. This is median real income, i.e. adjusted for inflation.
|
|
Wages
and salaries are barely keeping up with inflation, real household
incomes are down 8.5% since 2000 and state and local government taxes
and spending are rising at twice the rate of inflation--where does this lead to?
1. The bond market may choke if state and local governments try to "borrow our way to prosperity" as they did in the 2000s.
2. If state and local taxes keep soaring while wages stagnate and
household income declines, households will have less cash to spend on
consumption.
3. Declining consumer spending = recession.
4. In recessions, sales and income taxes decline as households spending drops. This will crimp state and local tax revenues.
5. This sets up an unvirtuous cycle:
state and local governments will have to raise taxes to maintain their
trend of higher spending. Higher taxes reduce household spending, which
reduces income and sales tax revenues. In response, state and local
governments raise taxes again. This further suppresses disposable income
and consumption. In other words, raising taxes offers diminishing
returns.
At some point, local government revenues will decline despite tax
increases and the bond market will raise the premium on local government
debt in response to the rising risks.
When borrowing become prohibitive (or impossible) and raising taxes no
longer generates more revenues, state and local governments will have to
cut expenditures. Given their many contractual obligations, these cuts
will slice very quickly into sinews and bone.
If this doesn't strike you a crisis, please check back in a few years. It is easily foreseeable, but very inconvenient. As a result, it too will be a crisis that "nobody saw coming."
NOTE:
Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received.
Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any
other individual, company or agency.
Federal Reserve Economic Data = FRED
Does anyone know Templeton's debt load? Which bonds retire and when? The duration of each bond and the pay back period?
ReplyDeleteHas the water department borrowed money from the USDA to paint the water tower? How much was borrowed and what is the duration of that borrowing? Does that borrowing from the USDA need to be voted at town meeting?
Voters in Templeton should have a clear picture of Templeton's debt BEFORE voting on a ballot question for a 50 million dollar elementary school.
When will the town's bond rating be restored?
What financial institution will allow the Town of Templeton to borrow without a bond rating?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteLooks like questions for Mr. Markel to answer, before any meeting takes place. This information and the estimated tax increase, (about $3.00 a thousand) from what I hear, should be given to the homeowners before the meeting. Nothing is worse than people trying to get up to speed, during a meeting, or just before a vote. Bev.
ReplyDelete