Paul working for you.

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

and from todays TGN

Kerry O'Brien
News Staff Writer

TEMPLETON — With voters being asked to vote on the school district’s budget for a fourth time on Friday at 7 p.m. at Narragansett Regional Middle School, town officials said they fear a “yes” vote could result in drastic cuts to town services, and urged residents to vote “no,” so that work toward a compromise, whereby reducing the district’s override request, can continue.

“I think the prudent thing to do is on Friday is to vote down the budget,” selectman Doug Morrison said. “It’s a pass-fail vote; there is no option to make changes. If we vote it down Friday, we have the joint town meeting to make adjustments.”

Selectman Kenn Robinson stated that the school district and town officials have begun discussion on proposing a reduced override.


“Both sides have admitted to each other that a compromise is needed,” said Robinson. “As a starting point we’ve said that negotiations, a compromise, is needed. Both sides have said we need an override of a lesser amount and to work to meet the gap.”

The Narragansett Regional School District submitted a $5.2 million assessment to the town, however after voters rejected the $691,086 override needed to support that amount of funding at the polls 948-851, Templeton officials asked the Annual Town Meeting voters to provide a $ 4.6 million budget for the district.

The town meeting voted to approve the $4.6 million budget, but also to send the override back to the polls. However, voters once again defeated the override request, 1,117-739.

Since the Annual Town Meeting was never presented with the school district’s full requested budget, by state law Templeton’s vote was by default a rejection of the school budget. The school committee then voted to resubmit their original budget on June 12 — giving the town 45 days to hold the special town meeting or the school district would automatically be entitled to their full budget request.

Although Monday was not a regularly scheduled meeting, upon his return from Afghanistan, Board of Selectmen chairman Jeffrey Bennett said he wanted to hold a discussion on Friday’s meeting, and said he wants the school district and the town to begin their budget discussion with the school district sooner next year.

“I hope this is a learning point for the town and the schools to have the conversation in December next year and again in January and sooner rather than later to get the best estimates we can for (the munipical and school) budgets, so we have a better idea of where we are then and we don’t end up where we are now,” he said.

Without their full requested budget, the school district stands to lose middle school sports, junior varsity sports, cheering invitational, music and theater transportation, late buses, an elementary school assistant principal, business teacher, a middle school assistant principal and band uniforms.

However residents and officials continue to assert that the town simply cannot afford override request.

“Last year, we had to decide (what town employees) would get the axe so the town could keep going,” said resident Bethany Bartolomeo. “Where are you going to cut from now? We have been crawling up this rock face with our fingernails, I’m sorry we can’t give (the school district) what you want.”

With the purpose of Friday’s meeting being to present the Annual Town Meeting with the school district’s full requested budget, despite discussion with the town of lowering their assessment, the school committee decided last week not to make any cuts to their budget.

“They wanted to wait and see the results of Friday before making any cuts,” school supporter Michael Gary said.

If voters approve appropriating the $5.2 million for the school district, the town will have to cut it’s municipal budget to accommodate the additional requested funding.

“Last year, some town employees took a 12.5 percent pay cut so the town didn’t have to touch the fire department, highway and police — the administrative office took this,” said Town Assessor Sue Byrne.

“You’re talking big hits to the fire, police, and highway,” Mr. Bennett said. “There are only a few places to cut.”

If voters reject the requested school district budget, it will trigger the next step in the state Department of Education’s process — a joint town meeting with Phillipston.

Phillipston voters also rejected their portion of the school district’s override request — $152,111— at the polls, but that town’s residents voted at their annual town meeting to provide the sum out of their free cash.

Members of the board of selectmen said the joint town meeting will be a good time for the town and school district to discuss their options with the school district budget.

“In a way it will be good for the budget to fail this Friday so we can have that conversation,” Mr. Bennett said. “We could bring a lower override, we could have a plan for next year.”

Advisory board member Wilfred Spring and other residents said they want to see cuts on the administrative level that won’t directly effect the students’ education.

“(The advisory board) saw the greatest increase in the school budget as being the administrative fees,” Mr. Spring said. “Over a 10-year period, they averaged a six percent increase. That percentage is so high you can end up more than doubling the amount you pay on administrative fees. The overall budget didn’t go up that high.”

“I want to see the cuts that won’t affect the kids,” Mr. Bennett said. “Rather than see those programs cut, I’d like to see administrative costs stay even rather than cut teachers.”

As the school district did not reach an agreement with both communities on the budget by July 1, they became one of nine regional school districts in the state to be put on a “1/12” budget by the state Department of Education. If the town and school district cannot come to an agreement by Dec. 1, the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will move to mandate what the towns will pay to the school district for the fiscal year.


17 comments:

  1. In my opinion this has been a long drawn out process possibly due to the lack of checks and balances on the school committee, nobody wants to say no and become the unpopular one. Equal blame needs to looked at to those who do not want to be part of the whole political process and expect others to make their decisions for them at town meeting. Hopefully with town meeting moving to Saturday next year this will enable all to participate in town meeting allowing perhaps a shorter outcome. I hope everyone appreciates I didn't mentioned the health problems associated with water fluoridation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I was growing up in Vermont, they prohibited the sale of alcohol on town meeting day! Just a thought.

      Delete
    2. Yes, we have been crawling out of this deep financial pit, by our fingernails, so now when we can see improvement, the School Committee and Gansett Greatness, want to push us back down!! The saddest thing about this whole thing is the GG group, still does not get it. When we were talking Monday night, It looked like Mr. Gary had tuned us out! After Mr.Spring had pointed out the error in the figures Mr. Gary presented, GG's facebook page did not correct the information they had given. So tell the people who follow that group, that the town is not paying what they should to the school, but when corrected they do not go back to give them the new information!! Is that fair to the people who get the information they need to make a fair decision from these people, hell NO...By the way, the town is paying more than the minimum.. Yes, come to Pauly's Templeton Watch, for the FACTS, as Julie likes to say. It will be interesting to see how Friday night goes. I hope the behavior is improved, over the last time we met. Bev...

      Delete
    3. It would be nice if The Gardner News got people's names right in their articles. I'm not sure if its the reporter or the editor who isn't fact checking before going to press. But I have yet to see an article where every name and figure were correct. Sorry Bev, your new name is "Bethany".

      Just as long as the correct information is given on town meeting floor regarding the percentage "required" vs. the percentage "suggested" by the state for the town's amount for the school budget, then that will be ok. People are going to believe what they want to believe regardless if its the truth or not. Its very confusing to understand all the accounting figures and it certainly can be distorted to favor a certain view. Mr. Spring puts a lot of time and effort into the Advisory Board's work. So, I will always believe his numbers over anyone else's. I'm glad he's helping the town get back on its feet financially and finding the past mistakes so we can learn from them as to not repeat them. Next year, maybe the school board and the L&W dept will be more willing to communicate with the BOS and the Advisory Board earlier in the budget process as requested. We all have learned the hard way what happens when they don't. I just hope that the school supporters will interact more with the rest of the town and see that even though voters do not support this particular school budget, it doesn't mean they don't support the kids. I also hope the point got across that we are all on the same team. Maybe they will regret their vote on the ET school out of retaliation and will support it the next time it comes up for a vote. If they want to sell off town property, then pay attention to what they're actually voting on. Using the CPC funds to fix that building would have been a fiscally responsible move for the town. But instead they voted it down because the roof wasn't fixed when it was an operating school (not the BOS fault, by the way). Its attitudes like that that need to change. I hope lots of lessons will be learned this year and the town can move on and supported by a unified, more informed community. I thought Jeff Bennett did a great job leading a very difficult discussion at the meeting. Let's hope more civil discussions continue in this poor town.

      Delete
    4. Templetonian, I have been called worse, so I do not care as long as the message gets across. I think part of the problem at that town meeting was, they did not know what CPC funds are, and I think they thought they could take that money for their project. I still do not think they know what a enterprise fund is. All they had to do is ask!!! No, that would be too easy. That means we have to do a better job of educating them. The schools in town have a very bad record of fixing anything, that will cost them money. I think if the repair is over five hundred dollars, they let it go , or they can come to the towns. Why does Templeton Center look the way it does?? That school has not seen a paint brush in many years. In my opinion, there is no excuse for that. It could be if it looks bad enough, they can have another reason to ask for a new school. I hope people come to the Meeting Friday night, and vote NO. It is my feeling that our School Committee has done a pretty good job at pissing off the voters, and they may have put any new project on the cutting board.. This may be a sad lesson for them to learn. Our Superintendent should learn to behave like a adult at the town meeting, put away her cell phone,(texting) and stop with wise remarks. People around you are not deaf or as dumb as she thinks they are!! Time will tell, it will all come out in the wash. My opinion, Bev.

      Delete
  2. The one thing i took from the BOS meeting is this. The education on our process needs to be a priority and should be taught to the students.This way they can explain it to their parents. The main things we were told about by GG speaker was the school system has cut 18 teachers in the past years.When asked how many have been hired back it was answered with a I don't know? Other questions i have and should be known is when has the school system employees "not" been given a pay raise? No one should feel we don't support the school system. If we don't support it please tell me where they get the $4.8 + million every year from. I thought it was from the town tax payers. It bothers me to no end for anyone to say we don't support it. They were told to level fund and work with the town and they didn't like that answer. I guess they should be taught about who supports them should be listened too.Not tricked into the process they use.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Although we fight over money issues here in town all the time the problem lies elsewhere. As our government prints more and more money to cover expenses that we have no control over, our money becomes devalued. A good article on this can be found at Templeton Times called Alice in Debtorland: Why the Red Queen's Race is Worth Recalling.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why is the difference in the raw budget numbers less than the total of the two overrides/additional funding requested from the towns by the school district. According to information supplied from the district, the 2013 budget was $18,164,592.00 and the proposed 2014 budget is $18,523,943.61. The difference I get is $359,351.00. So I am going to suppose that the district needs that $360,000.00 to have their 2014 budget so why do they ask for $691,086.00 from Templeton? Never mind the money Phillipston has already agreed to give the district. If memory serves me, the district used about $500,000.00 out the district reserve account to fill in their budget last time around. Now I am sure there be some fuzzy new math to explain why the district overall budget shows a shortage of $360,000.00 while the district asks Templeton for almost 700 thousand dollars but I can not help to think the district is trying to recoup the 500 thousand it used from their reserve fund when another override failed last time out. That is my thought. Of course if we had a meeting in good faith before town meeting perhaps this and other questions could have been answered. The vote on Friday has to be no to bring a combined town meeting and compromise and talk about where will the money come from. Of course if the district just level funds the problem for this year is fixed and we can begin now to talk of the next years budget. It is the only way to keep the town together and to solve the problem and answer some questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very interesting theory. I have asked on GG for an answer regarding the money going to the reserve fund. We shall see if I get an answer.

      Delete
    2. Jeff, Two members of GG both replied and believe that there no new money going into the reserve fund. Perhaps Dr. Miller can clarify this point for you.

      Delete
  5. Jeff - sounds like they are playing a shell game with us the tax payers. Here's another example in town where we need more transparency!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To that end would it be possible to link the NRSD website to the Town's website. There is no reference to the school system at all on the new site. The schools are part of the town,right?

      Delete
  6. The school might not be able to fund all the programs that they might like, but they have a valuable civics lesson staring them in the face. Have a class that shows how the budget for the town is calculated. How is the budget for the school calculated? Attend a selectman's meeting and write a report about it. Have the town coordinator give a presentation on his job. Have someone give a presentation on the finances of the windmill. Last year, MWCC had an energy management degree program and an intern at Narragansett, but I haven't heard of anyone using his report. Maybe this would be chance for everyone to learn something! Are there other ways to achieve "Narraganset Greatness"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fantastic idea Jan! Maybe if this could happen there would not be as much misinformation going around.

      Delete
    2. I have to give you credit for trying to present information to the GG group, although it sometimes seems, you are whistling into the wind.. This is not a good position for any of us to be in, but this where we stand now. There are too many things wrong with this picture. I can not understand how the School Committee could go along with this budget, especially after Mr. Spring met with them and tried to explain the financial mess the town is in. I heard him say he had asked the school to level fund their budget this year! The fact that the town is broke, is not a big secret. I hope the vote is a big NO, one more time, and these young people learn from this experience.. ,Bev.

      Delete
  7. I would gladly give the presentation on the big fan.
    Only one thing about that would be the cost certification audit still has not been finished so we would know what was spent and on what. Something that has been asked for from former light commissioner/selectmen time and time again. Also people at their meetings ask and we get nothing but a story about the results are due next month or 2 what ever works for them. Another certification on the machine was never done either. No answers about a certificate to show its certified. We ask they don't have answers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You and I both know this is not going to be a report that will make everyone cheer!! So, since it was supposed to be done in May, just maybe they have not posted a meeting, because they don't want this glorified report to see the light of day!!! The dollar figures will be a beauty!! Bev. By the way, what did that lady ask...How did it get there?? It could be they do not want to steal the show from the School Committee, they have done such a out standing job. HEE, Hee, Hee!

      Delete