Governor’s
Statement
Dear Municipal Leader,
Today, I signed the Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14) budget. It is a
balanced budget that supports core programs and policies that will help us
build a better, stronger Massachusetts.
There are many things in this budget of which to be proud, including:
$4.301 billion in Chapter 70 K-12 Education funding, a $130
million (3%) increase over FY13, making this the highest level of Chapter 70
funding in the state’s history;
$252 million to fully fund reimbursement of special education
costs for cities and towns, an increase of $22 million (10%) over FY13;
$51.5 million in Reimbursements to Regional School Districts for
the transportation of pupils, a $7 million (16%) increase from FY13;
$26.7 million for the Payment In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) program
for cities and towns, an increase of $500,000 (2%) above FY13; and
$48.3 million for Reimbursements to Municipalities for Veterans
Benefits, an increase of $6 million (12%) above FY13.
These investments are further examples of the strong partnership
between state government and the Commonwealth’s cities and towns.
However, in order to balance the budget, I have had to reduce
spending (I hope only temporarily).
This is because the Legislature’s budget depends on new tax revenue from
the Transportation Finance bill that has not yet been enacted into law. To take account of that uncertainty,
while the Legislature works out a final bill, I have reduced spending in the
budget in both unrestricted Local Aid, by $177 million, and transportation, by
$240 million.
I think you know how we got here. In January, I presented a comprehensive growth plan to
invest in education and transportation.
That plan included $1.2 billion for targeted investments in local and
regional transportation needs in all corners of the state, and an equitable way
to pay for them.
Since then, the Legislature has adopted a transportation bill
that aims to raise $800 million per year.
I am willing to compromise at that level so long as the revenue is
reliable. The Legislature’s bill
counts revenue from the tolls on the western turnpike that go away in a few
years. I have asked the
Legislature to close that gap before I sign the bill.
The reason this matters to you for budgeting purposes is that
the Legislature included revenue for the general fund in its transportation
proposal. Without that, the
conference budget they have sent me is out of balance.
I support the Local Aid funding included in the conference
budget (I originally proposed more), and I have proposed a mechanism to
automatically restore the funding if the Legislature enacts my amendment to the
transportation finance bill. That
way, in tandem with a transportation bill that provides a reliable $800 million
for our transportation infrastructure, we can make good on the full amount of
Local Aid.
I look forward to working with you to support Local Aid and our transportation needs with the strong
and reliable funding both need and deserve.
Looks to me like our schools will be in a lot better shape than the town. Our school committee had better get their pencils sharpened, and refigure their budget..I will not forget what they have been willing to do, kill the town that supports them. I hope you don't either.That is a fine thank you!! Bev.
ReplyDeleteThe first three parts of this blog show us a school budget to be reduced and ajustment to the towns share to be paid. How will this all work out and when will the school committee vote to recertify this new amount.
ReplyDeleteOk so lets recap a bit.
ReplyDelete1. Schools reimbursed for transportation costs
a, Athletic transportation - 50K
b. Transport k-12 469k+
c. SPED transport 412k +
2. Schools reimbursed for Special Education Cost
a.. Aides SN (if that means special needs) 76K +
So I would say that not only did they find their override money they found alot of extra money as well. Seems like the School Board needs to appologize to the town.
And since the state is reimbursing for the PILOT program looks like there is extra cash for the Town as well.
Guess the Governor made it all good.
Thats sounds good but when you figure the amount of slashing to local aid at 19% woops. Its still time to look at the school books and see the full picture of revenue vs. costs. It looks like a windfall for the school district.I would demand a line item change for the extra money doled out by the state. Now they want to pay for the mandated items with the local aid money. Who is peter and when do we get to meet paul? One doesn't get paid!
ReplyDeleteWe all need t write brewer and let him know the town needs the amount we were told we would get not just the school getting the pay back for the vote he got from the union members! Do we get a pilot payment for the ferncol property?
state forest denison area?
David, that is good point. It seems the State has a tight grip on the Ferncol School property, and now that the jobs are gone, it seems we should get something for it. Same with the State forest area, Seems like we could charge them a PILOT. The money to run this town needs to come from somewhere. Bev.
Delete