June
10, 2013 BOS Meeting
Another
well run and well attended meeting. Good job Kenn! The fist two agenda items
went quickly.
Janet
Morrison from North County Land Trust explained the conservation restriction
fro 66 acres at Dwelly farm. Three acres will not have a conservation
restriction in case the Town needs the three acres of prime agricultural soil
for an agricultural restriction. The land at TDC for an elementary school may
encroach on the cornfield on Crow Hill. An agricultural restriction on the land
(3 acres) at Dwelly farm may be needed to satisfy the state, so the elementary
school can be built. At the next BOS meeting Ms. Morrison will be back with the
paperwork for the conservation restriction on the 66 acres.
The
request from the Highway superintendent to transfer $900 from highway expense
account to the mechanic salary account was approved to go forward to the
Advisory Board.
DRAFT
STM articles-
Kenn
Robinson read each DRAFT warrant
article in order. Each was discussed after it was read. The first 5 articles
are routine housekeeping articles to close the books on FY 13. It is estimated
that there will be $300,000 in certified free cash once approved by the DOR.
Article
6 is an identical to Article 51 that was passed over at the ATM in May. It
seeks to create a new bylaw –Article LV – Municipal Water Department.
It
is the hoped that this bylaw, if adopted by Town meeting, will be reviewed by the
Attorney General, which will provide clarity and avoid a costly lawsuit that
TMLWP attorney is threatening.
NewsFlash
– Templeton is still in Worcester County!!
Article
7 seeks to provide the water department a partial budget with which to operate
until a STM in the Fall.
If
Article 6 passes, article 7 will provide
a limited water budget and allow the BOS to sign the water department warrants
after July 1, 2013, as well as give the Attorney General time to review the new
Bylaw LV – Municipal Water Department….because the Water Department will have
an appropriation.
Article
8 – This article is identical to the STM article in March brought forth by Dave
Smart. This article generated much discussion…. Some in favor, some against.
Former selectman (did he vote as a BOS member on Chapter 93 Acts of 2000?) and
water department foreman Randy Brown (projected to enjoy a 14% wage increase)
asked that this article be read again. NewsFlash –
Templeton is still in Worcester County!!
Article
9 is to settle up an unpaid bill from a prior year.
At
7:15 discussion began about the lack of an appropriation for the Water
Department. Kenn gave a good synopsis of the background that has led up to the
current situation.
BOS
position – lack of an appropriation for water department = no BOS signature on
warrants.
Chairman
of the Advisory Board, Wil Spring gave an extensive outline of the numerous
requests for a detailed line item budget from the manager of the TMLWP. The
Adv. Board chairman was looking for the same level of detail that had been
provided in prior years.
In
attendance was the TMLWP attorney Jack Ferriter, the author of Chapter 93 Acts
of 2000. Seems real eager to sue the Town of Templeton. Ferriter believes the
original intent of Chapter 93 Acts of 2000 would not necessitate the town
meeting approval for the water department budget. In other words, we have been
doing it wrong all this time! Rest assured the BOS has “an awful lot of
protection” if we sign off on a warrant with no appropriation.
Town
Counsel, Paul DeRensis, also spoke. He compared Town Counsel opinion to that of
an umpire, and he has called this a strike – BOS can’t sign if there is no
appropriation.
I
guess it comes down to who do you believe – the author of a flawed piece of
legislation[part of the INVESTIGATION
S623,
that is sitting in Judiciary awaiting a hearing] who is eager to sue the town OR Town Counsel who crafted the
proposed bylaw LV to resolve the issue without huge legal expense. Do you
believe an attorney who threatens expensive litigation at a public meeting that
YOU the taxpayer and ratepayer will
have to foot the bill for? A lawsuit brought forward by the Water Department
who can ill afford the expense of a lawsuit as they are currently running a
$65,000 deficit; handing out big raises, AND
DOUBLING YOUR SERVICE CHARGE!
NewsFlash –
Templeton is still in Worcester County!!
Paul
DeRensis stated there are two ways to resolve this:
1. Submit a detailed water
budget to Adv. Board for consideration and approval at STM
2. Pass an article (Article 6) to make Chapter 93
Acts of 2000 clear.
The
BOS has provided a similar solution with STM articles 6 and 7. These articles
buy time to have the proposed bylaw reviewed by the AG’s Office; avoiding an
expensive legal battle where everyone loses!
Discussion
came up about “communication”. Why weren’t these proposed articles disseminated
before last night’s meeting? Because
the BOS follow the Open meeting law. There was no prior discussion on these
articles before last night’s meeting. The discussion took place at the meeting.
These articles were not voted on last night. They will be voted on at the BOS
meeting on Wednesday night at 6:00 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS-
The
BOS voted to send a letter to the Templeton Fish & Game for the Summer swim
program. Doug mentioned the new rules governing public swimming programs.
A
number of appointments were made with more to come on June 24th.
Poll
workers and a vacation request were approved.
Technology
update –
The
BOS voted to send a request for expense of a new server to the Advisory Board.
The server at 690 Patriots Rd is limping along, with not much time left before
it finally goes.
Virtual
Town Hall should be up and running by July 1. Negotiations are taking place for
VTH to provide e-mail for the town.
MRPC
is looking for information in Templeton about walking trails. They are working
on updating local trail maps. Please contact the town coordinator at
978-939-8801 if you have any information about walking trails in Templeton.
Upcoming
meetings were announced.
Planning
Board Hearing 6/11/2013 @ 6:30
BOS 6/12/2013
@6:00
Cemetery
Commission 6/13/2013 @ 6:30
Advisory
Board 6/19/2013 @ 6:30
PRE-TOWN
@ 6:00
BOS
6/24/2013 @ 6:30
ELECTION
June 25, 2013 NRHS GYM
STM
June 27, 2013
My
opinions…supported by FACTS ! ! !
Julie
Farrell
thankyou for letting me know that were still in Worcester county its better to ask than assume ,with the state redistricting I just wanted to make sure.And randy brown didn't get a 14% wage increase but the people assumed it ,but if they checked they would have found my base pay the same and I have call weekends and over time I get paid for ,time worked THANKS RANDY BROWN 25 YEAR EMPLOYEE OF THE TOWN
ReplyDeleteRandy, If your overlords were more forthcoming with information, you might not have been criticized. by the way, with your exhorbitant salary, you'd think you would get your constable uniform washed and pressed and look a bit more presentable at town floor.
ReplyDeleteDid Randy Brown vote on the chapter 93 acts of 2000? Was he a Selectmen when he voted on it? Was he a employee of the water department when he voted on this issue?
ReplyDeleteWhat say you baby huey!
Your boss turned in a budget showing us the amount for 2013=59,952.00 for 2014 68,277.00 = 14.36% increase in compensation. Are these figures in dispute or are they the correct amounts that were given. This shows the people the truth about the budget and what it was hidden.
Good luck this time Dana,Greg,Chris!
You won't need to call the lawyer about this article "8" it's the same one i had.You've been informed by our lawyer one time already. Now the facts have been lived and people know what the truth is!
I have never heard of overtime being budgeted for, like this. Wouldn't a base pay be one line item, and overtime be another? Sure looks like one hell of a pay increase to me. It will all come out in the wash. Thanks for working for the town for 25 years. Any of those jobs, working in a hole in the ground are not easy. I do not begrudge anyone a days pay, but when the rest of the people working for the town are struggling to live with little or no raises, it is not right for you guys to be treated better. My opinion, Bev.
Delete...Nice to see "baby huey randy" is cruzin the internet on "company" time (11:41 am) I suppose thats why he gets salary plus overtime.
ReplyDeleteWith the meter reader mowing the water dept. lawns,he should have the extra time to cover the tracks of the management,9.10% of the time.Why does the meter reader mow the water dept. grass on willow street?
ReplyDeleteWhen i see the water dept duties done by light dept. in light dept vehicles it makes me wonder how they keep things seperate like they should?Or do they? Does my 3.00 light customer charge go to pay for the water dept.lawn care? Or is this just a payback for the unlawful rent charge the water dept was paying the light 35K per year for years. It's called rob peter to fatten paul's surplus account.
Our surplus account. No one questioned that untill i did,The response was obtuse and a negative commission was at a loss for answers. What charge for rent?We do things right over here!
Time for them to go, put the books on the table to be checked over close by and for the town of Templeton and return the money they have charged us for things they should not have. I'll volenteer my time to point out alot more of the things not correct to charge for.
The fact the General manager added to his budget for next year the cost of a lawyer this year is one of them. But it was only another 5,000.00 but his budget for 2014 shows #633-00 a total of 12,000.00 for the year adding another 5k makes it 17k a 40% increase without even a thought. News flash Templeton Water Rate will soon be on the rise.
The double service charge will end and the rate study will kick in in time to take over for them to have the money to keep up the bulls---.